By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Divorce in Korea is highly stigmatized, viewed as a violation of both socialist and Confucian ideals. This societal pressure impacts individuals across both North and South Korea. The strong emphasis on family unity and social harmony contributes to the negative perception surrounding divorce. Consequently, divorce carries significant social consequences and remains a sensitive issue in Korean society.
Read the original article here
Kim Jong-un’s latest decree regarding divorce is, to put it mildly, astonishing. The new rule mandates that both parties involved in a divorce will be sent to labor camps. Previously, only the individual initiating the divorce faced this punishment, which, while still incredibly harsh, now seems almost lenient in comparison. This change raises a lot of questions, not least of which is the sheer inhumanity of the entire situation.
This new policy represents a significant escalation in the already draconian measures taken by the North Korean regime. It effectively removes any agency from individuals considering divorce, regardless of the circumstances. Even if one party is coerced into a divorce, or perhaps desperately wants out of an abusive marriage, they’ll be sent to a labor camp. It eliminates the possibility of seeking refuge from domestic violence, transforming what should be a legal process into a life-altering punishment for all involved.
It’s a stark illustration of how the regime prioritizes its control over the well-being of its citizens. The seemingly arbitrary nature of the decision leaves one wondering what the ultimate goal is. Is it genuinely about population control, given that Kim Jong-un has previously expressed concerns about declining birth rates? Or is it primarily a demonstration of power, a way to maintain absolute control and instill fear in the population?
The idea that a government would force couples to remain together, regardless of their happiness or safety, is frankly horrifying. It throws into sharp relief the complete absence of personal freedom and autonomy within North Korea. It effectively eliminates the concept of consent, rendering marriage itself a tool of the state rather than a personal choice.
Adding to the chilling effect of this policy is the broader context of North Korean life. Labor camps are notorious for their inhumane conditions, representing a constant threat that hangs over the heads of citizens. The fear of being sent to a labor camp is a powerful tool for controlling the population, forcing compliance and discouraging dissent. This new rule pushes that fear to an even greater level, making even the consideration of divorce a terrifying prospect.
It’s difficult to understand the logic behind this decree, even considering the oppressive nature of the North Korean regime. While increasing the population might be a stated goal, this approach seems counterintuitive. Forcing individuals into marriages and then punishing divorce will likely have the opposite effect; it would make people more wary of marriage, resulting in even lower birth rates. The fear it engenders could lead to the very outcome Kim Jong-un wishes to prevent.
The situation is further complicated by the lack of independent reporting and verification from within North Korea. It’s difficult to determine the precise extent of the policy’s implementation or its impact on the population. However, even limited information paints a grim picture of a country where human rights are severely violated, and where the state wields absolute power over its citizens’ lives.
The contrast between the regime’s actions and the expressed desires of its people is stark. While Kim Jong-un might desire a larger population, forcing unwilling individuals into marriages and then threatening them with labor camps hardly seems like a viable or humane solution. Indeed, it could be argued that such harsh measures are directly counterproductive to achieving the desired outcome.
In conclusion, the new rule concerning divorce in North Korea highlights the brutal reality of life under Kim Jong-un’s regime. It demonstrates a chilling disregard for human rights and basic freedoms. While it ostensibly aims to address concerns about population decline, its harshness and lack of empathy suggest that control and the preservation of the regime’s authority are the true driving forces behind this disturbing decision. The long-term consequences for North Korean society remain to be seen, but the immediate impact is one of heightened fear and repression.