By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Investigation into the AZAL flight crash in Kazakhstan points to the Russian Pantsir-S air defense system as the cause. A Russian missile struck the aircraft, resulting in 38 deaths and 29 survivors. Despite pilot requests, the plane was denied landing at Russian airports and subsequently had its GPS jammed while flying over the Caspian Sea. Azerbaijani government sources confirmed the missile strike as the reason for the tragedy.
Read the original article here
The confirmation of a Russian Pantsir-S air defense system’s involvement in the downing of an Azerbaijani passenger plane over Kazakhstan is a deeply disturbing development. The sheer audacity of this act, targeting a civilian airliner, underscores a level of recklessness and disregard for human life that is profoundly unsettling. Reports suggest that despite the pilots’ emergency calls for landing, the plane was inexplicably denied access to Russian airports, instead being directed over the Caspian Sea towards Aktau.
This deliberate routing of the plane over the Caspian Sea raises serious questions. The suggestion that the plane’s GPS navigation systems were jammed further strengthens the suspicion of intentional targeting. It’s hard not to conclude this was a calculated attempt to ensure the plane crashed in a location that would complicate any investigation or retrieval of evidence. The fact that the plane remained airborne for a considerable time after the alleged missile strike speaks volumes about the resilience of the aircraft and the skill of the pilots, who ultimately managed to attempt an emergency landing, even with such immense difficulties.
The suggestion that this was a deliberate act, and not a tragic accident, is further supported by several considerations. The Pantsir-S system, while intended for air defense, seems alarmingly adept at targeting civilian aircraft, a stark contrast to its relatively poor performance against military targets. This discrepancy raises unsettling questions about the training, competence, and even the intent of those operating the system. The incident is not an isolated one, and evokes comparisons to previous tragedies involving civilian aircraft shot down in circumstances hinting at foul play.
The international community’s response, or rather lack thereof, to this incident is equally concerning. There’s a widespread feeling of powerlessness in the face of such blatant aggression. The suggestion that countries are hesitant to directly confront Russia, fearing escalation to a larger conflict, is sadly palpable. This fear of provoking a more significant confrontation should not, however, excuse inaction. The repeated nature of these incidents, the apparent impunity enjoyed by the perpetrators, and the devastating loss of innocent lives demand a stronger, more united response.
The repeated pattern of seemingly deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure—including undersea cables and power lines—suggests a calculated strategy designed to destabilize and exert influence beyond Russia’s borders. This approach fuels the perception of Russia as an increasingly aggressive actor, willing to use violence and intimidation to achieve its objectives, regardless of the human cost. It is certainly not a matter of merely “testing limits”; rather, it seems to be an outright display of contempt for international norms and the sanctity of human life.
The lack of readily available video evidence showing a missile strike is not necessarily contradictory to the reports of the incident. The difficulty in obtaining such evidence, especially in the aftermath of a crash, is not unexpected. Yet, the absence of visual proof shouldn’t overshadow the substantial circumstantial evidence pointing towards a deliberate attack. Moreover, the testimony of Azerbaijani government sources, along with the other corroborating elements, strengthens the case for foul play.
This incident must serve as a wake-up call. The world cannot afford to remain silent in the face of such blatant disregard for international law and human life. We must demand accountability, and we must take decisive action to prevent future tragedies. The loss of 38 lives is an unbearable burden, but it should also serve as a catalyst for change, pushing for decisive measures to ensure such reckless acts are never repeated. The silence that follows such tragedies is as culpable as the act itself. The international community needs to move beyond mere words and act decisively to prevent future incidents. The current inaction only encourages further aggression.