By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A CBS News investigation uncovered a widespread pattern of law enforcement officers, including chiefs and sheriffs, illegally selling firearms, often high-powered weapons obtained through their official positions, for personal profit. This practice resulted in weapons being sold to criminals and used in violent crimes. The investigation revealed at least 50 cases over the past 20 years, with many officers pleading guilty or being convicted. The ATF’s lax oversight and reluctance to prosecute contributed to this problem, highlighting a significant loophole in the system for regulating military-grade weapons.
Read the original article here
Police illegally selling restricted weapons and supplying criminals is a disturbing and widespread problem. The case of Adair, Iowa, with its tiny population and its police department’s request for 90 machine guns, including a minigun, highlights this issue perfectly. The subsequent conviction of Chief Bradley Wendt for conspiracy, lying to federal agents, and illegal weapons possession underscores the reality of this corruption. Wendt’s unapologetic attitude and appeal of his five-year sentence only exacerbates the gravity of the situation. His claim that “If I’m guilty of this, every cop in the nation’s going to jail” hints at a systemic problem far beyond his individual actions.
The reluctance of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute their own is shocking. Statements like “We’re not looking to prosecute fellow law enforcement officers” from former ATF special agent Eric Harden expose a blatant disregard for justice and accountability. This inaction creates a culture of impunity, emboldening further illegal activity and undermining public trust. This lack of oversight allows the illegal sale of restricted weapons to flourish, directly contributing to increased crime rates.
This isn’t an isolated incident. Data shows that thousands of guns traced to crime scenes originated from government agencies, law enforcement, or the military. The example of Oakley, Michigan, a small town with an unusually large number of deputies who were allegedly selling deputizations, further illustrates this pattern. This isn’t simply a matter of individual officers acting badly; it suggests a broader, systemic failure within law enforcement structures. The claim that this is a simple supply and demand issue, where police create demand and then supply it, ignores the crucial ethical and legal violations at the heart of the matter. The idea that police are merely overseeing crime, rather than preventing it, becomes tragically evident in these cases.
The very institutions tasked with upholding the law are actively contributing to the problem they are supposed to solve. This self-perpetuating cycle – selling restricted weapons, catching criminals using them, seizing the weapons, and repeating – reveals a deeply entrenched issue. The inherent conflict of interest is undeniable; the police, who benefit from the existence of crime, are actively involved in its creation. This is a shocking subversion of the very system designed to protect the public.
The ease with which officers can access cheaper weapons due to their exemptions from gun regulations, combined with the potential for profiting from gun buyback programs, further fuels this corrupt system. The argument that only police should have guns, while simultaneously ignoring the rampant misuse of those weapons by the very same officers, is profoundly hypocritical. The lack of meaningful consequences for these actions – as seen in cases where officers face minimal jail time and retain their assets – demonstrates a deeply flawed system that requires immediate and sweeping reform.
The casual disregard for the severity of the consequences – a police chief suggesting that his actions are commonplace – is appalling. It highlights the deeply rooted culture of impunity that allows this to continue. The sheer audacity of using a Gatling gun, a weapon of war, as part of this scheme, shows the level of disregard for the law and the potential for carnage.
The idea that this is simply a matter of individual bad apples ignores the systematic failures that permit such behavior. The lack of proper oversight, the reluctance to prosecute, and the minimal consequences for those caught highlight a need for dramatic reform within law enforcement. The systemic problems revealed by these cases necessitate a fundamental re-evaluation of policing, including stricter regulations, enhanced oversight, and significantly harsher penalties for those who betray the public trust. The current system is demonstrably failing, and its continued existence represents a grave threat to public safety and justice.