By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A new Global Commission on Drug Policy report advocates for the decriminalization of drug use and possession in the U.S. and Canada, citing the failure of the “War on Drugs.” The report, authored by numerous former world leaders, recommends harm reduction strategies like expanding access to opioid agonist therapy and safer supply models to curb overdose deaths. Instead of prohibition, the report emphasizes health, human rights, and social equity as the guiding principles for effective drug policy, arguing that current punitive measures have led to increased violence and disproportionately impacted marginalized communities. The report highlights the ineffectiveness of prohibition, noting that drug use continues to rise despite substantial global spending on enforcement.
Read the original article here
The international war on drugs, a decades-long campaign waged with significant resources, has demonstrably failed to meet its own stated goals. Even assuming the best of intentions from its inception, the approach of focusing solely on suppressing supply while ignoring the underlying demand for drugs was fundamentally flawed. This strategy was inherently destined for failure, and the evidence overwhelmingly points to its inadequacy.
The criminalization of drug possession, specifically, has proven ineffective and counterproductive. While there should be consequences for drug trafficking and distribution, the current system’s harsh penalties are disproportionate and often unjust. The arbitrary thresholds for “intent to distribute,” such as possessing a certain number of pills, criminalize individuals who may be users rather than traffickers. This needs to be revised to hold accountable those who directly cause harm through drug-related deaths, such as irresponsible suppliers and manufacturers, equally with those who distribute drugs illegally on the street. Pharmaceutical companies and pharmacists who cause harm through negligence should face the same consequences, ensuring equity under the law.
Decriminalizing simple possession is a critical step toward a more effective and humane approach. Criminal penalties should be reserved for actions that directly harm others, such as driving under the influence, drug-facilitated assault, and providing drugs to individuals without consent. Prosecuting a college student for possessing a small amount of Adderall for studying or an elderly person for possessing marijuana at home is absurd and represents a colossal waste of resources. Instead, those struggling with addiction should receive support and treatment, not prison sentences.
Personal drug use in one’s own home should remain a matter of individual choice, with the understanding that individuals bear the responsibility for their actions and the consequences thereof. The government’s focus should shift from criminalizing personal consumption to harm reduction and public health. Regulated access to certain substances, akin to the current model for alcohol and tobacco, could help mitigate the risks associated with unregulated drug use. This would require carefully controlled distribution, similar to how medications are currently dispensed, to ensure quality, accurate dosing, and monitor consumption. This would also move drug manufacturing into safer, regulated hands. The current system, which ignores the well-established flow of US manufactured guns fueling violence in Mexico, proves a glaring example of failure.
The war on drugs has not only failed to curb drug use, but it has also had devastating social and economic consequences. The incarceration of individuals for non-violent drug offenses has fueled mass incarceration and disproportionately impacted marginalized communities, leading to social inequities and mistrust in government institutions. This approach has also inadvertently legitimized organized crime and created lucrative markets for criminal enterprises.
A more rational approach would recognize the failure of prohibition and embrace harm reduction strategies. Shifting the focus from a “war” mentality to a public health approach, including safe and regulated drug access, could generate substantial revenue through taxation, reduce the power of criminal organizations, and reduce rates of drug-related illness and death. The current situation is illogical and unsustainable. It has resulted in countless deaths, incarceration, and social disruption with demonstrably little impact on reducing drug supply or consumption.
The continued reliance on punitive measures, despite overwhelming evidence of their ineffectiveness, raises concerns about the priorities and motivations behind the war on drugs. The significant financial interests in maintaining the status quo are undeniable. The massive profits associated with incarceration and the resulting economic incentives tied to law enforcement and the prison industrial complex create powerful interests in perpetuating the failed strategy.
Ultimately, a paradigm shift is essential. Decriminalization, regulation, and a focus on public health initiatives offer a more viable path toward reducing harm, enhancing safety, and improving public trust. The current strategy, regardless of its initial intent, has proven itself an abject failure, and a radical rethinking of the approach is not only necessary, but long overdue.