By John Q. Hosedrinker 
China has greenlit construction of a massive hydropower project on Tibet’s Yarlung Tsangpo River, potentially tripling the Three Gorges Dam’s energy output. This undertaking, with a projected cost exceeding US$137 billion, presents significant engineering hurdles due to the river’s immense scale and location in a high-rainfall area. The dam will be situated within the world’s deepest canyon, harnessing the river’s substantial vertical drop. This project represents the largest single infrastructure investment globally.
Read the original article here
China’s approval of a massive dam in Tibet, projected to generate three times the power of the Three Gorges Dam, is sparking considerable international debate. This colossal project, estimated to cost $137 billion USD, aims to produce a staggering 60 GW of power – an output comparable to approximately 40 nuclear power plants and almost the entire annual electricity consumption of the United Kingdom. The sheer scale of the undertaking is undeniably impressive, but the potential consequences are equally vast and, for some, deeply concerning.
The dam’s location in remote, steep mountain valleys presents significant engineering challenges, even for a nation with China’s ambitious infrastructure capabilities. Construction in such a geographically demanding environment will undoubtedly be complex and costly, requiring immense resources and expertise. The sheer magnitude of the project, however, dwarfs even these considerable logistical hurdles.
The potential impact on downstream nations is a major point of contention. The river system fed by the dam flows through parts of southwest China, India, and crucially, supports over 170 million people in Bangladesh. Concerns about water scarcity and the potential for droughts are understandably heightened, given the scale of the dam’s water retention capacity. The dam’s impact on water flow regulation, while potentially beneficial in controlling floods and providing a more consistent water supply during droughts, is still a major point of worry for downstream populations.
Beyond immediate concerns about water access, the ecological implications of this project are profound. The dam’s construction site is located in one of the world’s richest temperate ecosystems, spanning across southeastern Tibet, Yunnan, and Sichuan in China, as well as northern Myanmar and eastern Arunachal Pradesh in India. The dam’s construction could trigger a cascade of further dam construction in India, potentially leading to the destruction of vast tracts of biodiverse forest and the displacement of numerous communities. Unlike China, India lacks extensive protected areas in this crucial region, leaving it more vulnerable to such widespread ecological damage.
The dam’s proximity to the Indian border adds another layer of complexity. Situated in a region prone to heavy rainfall and increasingly susceptible to climate change effects like glacial melt, the risk of catastrophic floods in India and Bangladesh in the event of dam failure is a significant and potentially devastating threat. This heightened risk raises serious questions about whether the project is purely a hydropower initiative or something more akin to a strategic water weapon.
The Three Gorges Dam itself serves as a cautionary tale, with ongoing concerns about structural integrity and its impact on the surrounding environment. Concerns are raised that China may not have learned sufficient lessons from the Three Gorges project, given the immense scale and potential risks associated with this new, far larger endeavor. This raises doubts on the overall long-term sustainability of this approach towards hydroelectric power generation. The cost-benefit analysis compared to alternatives like solar and wind power also casts significant doubt on the wisdom of such a massive undertaking.
Furthermore, the geopolitical implications are significant. The potential for increased tension between China and its downstream neighbors, particularly India, over water resources is palpable. The dam creates significant leverage for China, potentially exacerbating existing geopolitical complexities in the region. The project further underscores the need for improved regional cooperation and dialogue on transboundary water management. This is especially critical given that around 70% of the river’s water originates within the Indian portion of the river basin, highlighting the inherent asymmetry in the project’s impact and control.
In conclusion, while the potential for increased power generation is undeniable, the China-approved Tibet dam presents a multifaceted challenge with potentially devastating consequences. Concerns about water scarcity, ecological damage, geopolitical instability, and the overall long-term sustainability of this kind of large-scale hydroelectric power generation all merit close attention and critical evaluation. The world watches as this ambitious project unfolds, acutely aware of its far-reaching implications.