By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Recent polls indicating high satisfaction with private health insurance fail to account for the reality of patients facing unaffordable care, as evidenced by Dr. Ed Weisbart’s experiences with patients unable to afford essential medications or treatments. The current for-profit system prioritizes profit over patient well-being, leading to claim denials and delays, particularly for expensive procedures. This system is further complicated by fragmented care, an inability to negotiate prices, and high administrative overhead, contributing to significantly higher costs compared to other developed nations. Ultimately, a move toward a single-payer system, while challenging politically, is seen as the most effective solution to address these systemic flaws and ensure access to quality healthcare for all Americans.
Read the original article here
The stark reality of “I can’t afford my oxygen” highlights a fundamental flaw in America’s healthcare system: the pervasive influence of for-profit insurance. This isn’t simply a matter of inconvenience; it’s a life-or-death struggle for many. The current system, far from providing healthcare, prioritizes corporate profits, leaving countless individuals sicker and poorer.
Consider the simple act of obtaining water. In many areas, the cost remains consistent, offering reliable service with various payment options. This predictability is a direct result of non-profit management, ensuring affordability and accessibility. Imagine, however, if water provision were privatized; prices would skyrocket, service quality would likely plummet, and navigating billing would become a bureaucratic nightmare. The same principle applies to healthcare.
The profit motive corrupts the very foundation of healthcare. The sheer administrative burden placed on physicians, with exorbitant sums spent on dealing with insurance companies—money that ultimately translates to higher patient costs—is a prime example. This hidden cost is often overlooked, exacerbating the financial strain on both patients and providers. What truly exists isn’t a healthcare system, but a collection of for-profit entities primarily concerned with maximizing revenue, often at the expense of patient well-being.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA), while intending to improve the situation, has had a complex impact. While it eliminated some predatory practices like pre-existing condition exclusions and lifetime caps, and provided some expansion of coverage and support for rural hospitals, it has not fundamentally changed the for-profit nature of the industry. In fact, some argue it strengthened for-profit insurance companies. The debate continues as to whether its overall impact has been positive or negative, but one thing is certain; it hasn’t solved the core issue of profit-driven healthcare.
The problem isn’t just about insurance companies. The entire system incentivizes cost-cutting measures that compromise quality and access to care. The staggering number of administrative staff needed to deal with insurance claims compared to a simple, non-profit system like our local water service demonstrates how inefficient, convoluted and costly the current infrastructure is. Pharmaceutical companies and even some medical professionals themselves may be motivated by profit, leading to situations like the opioid crisis—a tragic consequence of a system more interested in revenue than patient health.
The narrative shifts beyond the individual and encompasses the political landscape. The excessive influence of corporations in politics ensures that legislation favors profit over people. This results in a system designed to enrich a few at the expense of the many. The very term “healthcare system” becomes a misnomer, more accurately reflecting a “corporate profit system” prioritizing shareholder value over the welfare of its citizens. The inherent problem lies in the fact that the current framework operates as a market, one in which health itself is a commodity to be bought and sold, often with exorbitant costs and unequal access, particularly for low income families. In this market, the goal is not to improve health but to generate profit.
The solution calls for a fundamental paradigm shift—one that prioritizes the inherent right to healthcare over the pursuit of profit. The current situation is not only morally wrong, but economically unsustainable. The long-term costs of a system that leaves people sicker and poorer will only escalate. It is a system that demands urgent reform, requiring a move towards a more equitable, accessible, and non-profit model. A truly effective solution will need to address the broader systemic issues, including the political influence of corporations and the need for public investment in infrastructure. The absence of a truly public, affordable, and universal healthcare system leaves citizens at the mercy of a system increasingly designed not to treat them but to take advantage of their vulnerability and desperation.