By John Q. Hosedrinker 
PornHub will block access from Florida users starting January 1, 2025, in response to a new state law mandating age verification for adult websites. The company argues that requiring users to submit driver’s license information jeopardizes privacy and will ultimately be ineffective, citing an 80% traffic drop in Louisiana after similar legislation. Florida’s law, part of broader social media regulations, carries significant fines for non-compliance. PornHub contends that this approach drives users to unregulated, potentially unsafe sites, advocating for device-based age verification instead.
Read the original article here
Florida is set to lose access to PornHub starting January 1st, 2025, due to new state legislation concerning age verification for online content deemed harmful to minors. This law mandates that websites hosting such material must implement age verification procedures, including options for both anonymous and standard identification. PornHub, and its parent company Aylo, argue that requiring the collection of driver’s license information for millions of users poses significant privacy risks, outweighing the benefits of age verification. They contend that the current approach, which demands extensive personal data, is jeopardizing user safety and ultimately making the internet less secure, not more.
The company cites the example of Louisiana, where PornHub’s compliance with similar legislation resulted in an 80% drop in site traffic. This, they highlight, didn’t eliminate porn consumption; instead, it merely shifted users to unregulated, potentially dangerous platforms with less stringent content moderation and user privacy protections. They believe a more effective solution involves age verification at the source, meaning on the user’s device, rather than relying on extensive data collection by the website itself.
This impending loss of access to PornHub in Florida is expected to lead to a significant increase in the use of VPNs. This prediction is based on past instances in other states where similar bans were implemented, leading to a surge in VPN searches and usage. The expectation is that Floridians seeking to circumvent the ban will utilize these tools to mask their location and continue accessing the site. This suggests the law might be ineffective in achieving its goal of protecting minors, as resourceful users will likely find ways around it.
The irony of the situation isn’t lost on many commentators. The perceived hypocrisy of politicians advocating for a ban on PornHub while likely partaking in the very activity they are seeking to restrict is a recurring theme in the discussions surrounding this legislation. The argument is frequently made that this law will disproportionately affect those who rely on online platforms for accessing adult content and doesn’t necessarily address the root causes of harmful content consumption. Instead of focusing on banning access, a more comprehensive strategy involving sex education and addressing broader societal issues is suggested as a better approach.
The likely response of those affected by the ban also fuels conversations. Many believe that the ban will inevitably drive people towards less safe and unregulated corners of the internet, putting both adults and children at risk. Others point to the predicted increase in VPN usage and the potential for this to boost the profits of VPN companies, further highlighting the potential futility of such legislation. Furthermore, some observers believe the whole situation presents a rather comical scenario, particularly for those politically opposed to the legislation. The prospect of frustrated users scrambling for alternatives and the predicted increase in VPN searches are presented as an ironic outcome, directly contrasting with the intended effect of the law.
The upcoming ban creates a situation where the law’s efficacy is heavily debated. Will it truly protect minors, or will it simply push users towards less regulated and potentially harmful platforms? The increased use of VPNs in response to the ban, as seen in other states, suggests the latter may be more likely. The focus shifts, then, to the underlying question of whether legislative efforts targeting online adult content are actually effective in protecting minors or if other solutions are necessary. The overall discussion brings into question whether this approach is an effective strategy or if there are alternative ways to achieve the intended goal without potentially compromising privacy and increasing the risk of exposure to harmful unregulated content.