By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Vladyslav Selezniov, a Ukrainian Armed Forces colonel, predicts a renewed Russian offensive in southern Ukraine, focusing on crossing the Dnipro River near Kherson. This offensive, involving over 120,000 Russian troops and amphibious assets, aims to establish bridgeheads on the right bank, mirroring previous Ukrainian successes. Selezniov anticipates continued reconnaissance efforts and costly assaults, highlighting the Ukrainian military’s ability to effectively counter these attacks. Despite the low probability of Russian success, these actions will pose significant challenges to Ukrainian defenses in the Kherson region.
Read the original article here
Russian troops are desperately attempting to cross the Dnipro River in the Kherson region, seemingly willing to accept heavy losses to achieve their goal. Their stated aim is to establish multiple bridgeheads on the right bank, securing a foothold in Ukrainian territory. This desperate push speaks volumes about the current state of the conflict, and the importance Russia places on this particular objective.
This latest offensive represents a significant gamble for the Russian military. Their first attempt to cross the Dnipro has already been decisively repulsed by Ukrainian forces, indicating the difficulty of the undertaking and the strength of the Ukrainian defense. It seems counterintuitive for Russia to repeatedly attempt a crossing, given the significant losses they are likely to sustain. The fact that they are continuing despite initial failure underlines a strong strategic imperative, perhaps exceeding the immediate cost in terms of manpower and materiel.
The nature of this offensive suggests a significant degree of desperation on the part of the Russian leadership. It speaks to the limitations of their current military capabilities and their diminishing prospects for further gains elsewhere along the front lines. These repeated assaults suggest an attempt to secure any kind of battlefield victory, however small, to bolster morale and potentially leverage a better negotiating position in future talks.
The timing of this offensive may also be politically driven. With shifts in potential international support for Ukraine and speculation about upcoming peace negotiations, Russia may be attempting to strengthen its hand at the negotiating table. A successful crossing, even a small one, could be used to claim progress and justify harsher terms in any subsequent agreement. Conversely, the failure to achieve a bridgehead could severely weaken their bargaining position.
However, the Ukrainian military, having already successfully repelled a previous Russian attempt to cross the Dnipro and gained experience using precision weapons, are well-positioned to once again inflict heavy casualties on the invading forces. The strategic importance of the Dnipro River as a natural barrier in the region should not be underestimated; the Ukrainians are fighting to maintain control of this crucial natural defense line. A successful Ukrainian defense, therefore, would be a significant blow to the Russian war effort and a major setback for their overall campaign goals.
The high cost and low reward of the Russian attempt to create a bridgehead across the Dnipro raises significant questions about their strategic thinking. Why risk such heavy losses for what might only amount to a minor and unsustainable territorial gain? Perhaps the desperation stems from a broader strategic calculation, weighing the potential political and diplomatic gains against the undeniable military costs. The outcome of this ongoing struggle could significantly alter the trajectory of the conflict.
In the context of ongoing conflict, the decision by the Russian military to launch repeated offensives across a heavily defended river is a significant risk. The considerable loss of life and resources may not justify the minimal territorial gains expected from such a risky operation. The potential cost in terms of human lives and military equipment is substantial, and the likelihood of a meaningful payoff appears limited.
Considering the previous unsuccessful crossing attempts, this operation seems to prioritize a symbolic victory over a strategically sound military maneuver. The repeated frontal assaults also suggest a disregard for the lives of Russian soldiers, a disturbing trend that has marked the conflict from its outset. Ultimately, the desperate attempts to cross the Dnipro River demonstrate Russia’s deepening difficulties in the conflict and the dwindling options they may have at their disposal. The success or failure of these actions will have profound implications for the war’s trajectory.