By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Calls by prominent Trump supporters to revoke the 19th Amendment, granting women the right to vote, signal a potential broader attack on the electoral system. This movement, fueled by Christian nationalism, frames the repeal not as disenfranchisement, but as restoring a “family vote” where men represent their households. This echoes historical anti-suffragist arguments and aligns with Project 2025, a far-right plan outlining aggressive voter suppression tactics. The ultimate goal appears to be the establishment of a Christian nationalist state, where women’s rights are significantly curtailed or eliminated.
Read the original article here
Christian Nationalism’s First Item on the Agenda: Repeal Women’s Right to Vote
The idea that Christian Nationalism’s primary goal is to repeal the 19th Amendment and revoke women’s suffrage is alarming, but not entirely unfounded. Several prominent figures within this movement have openly expressed disdain for women’s political participation, framing it as a theft of their “vote” or a deviation from a divinely ordained family structure. This isn’t merely idle chatter; it’s a reflection of deeply held beliefs within a segment of the population that are gaining traction.
The rhetoric surrounding this issue is disturbingly casual. Some prominent voices in the movement openly express their preference for a system where only men vote, sometimes suggesting their wives’ votes act as a form of “restitution” for the perceived injustice of women having the right to vote in the first place. This shows a fundamental disregard for women’s autonomy and a blatant attempt to undermine their political power.
The implications extend beyond a single, isolated incident. This desire to repeal the 19th Amendment is being presented as part of a broader agenda to reshape the electoral system and political landscape to align with a particular ideology. It’s not a fringe element either; documented statements and public pronouncements of influential figures within the movement reinforce this dangerous trend.
The casual way in which this goal is discussed – the flippant remarks about “Project 2035” and the comparison to establishing a “Christian Taliban” – are chilling. It underscores the lack of seriousness with which some proponents treat the potential consequences of their actions. Their disregard for established democratic norms creates a palpable sense of unease.
While the likelihood of a full-scale repeal of the 19th Amendment appears remote given the procedural hurdles involved, the fact that such a notion is even being seriously considered is deeply concerning. The very discussion is a threat, a demonstration of the extent to which certain individuals and groups are willing to go to subvert democratic processes.
Dismissing this as mere fear-mongering is dangerous. While not everyone within Christian Nationalism shares this extreme view, ignoring its presence within the movement is an act of willful blindness. The fact that the threat of repealing women’s suffrage exists indicates a potential willingness to dismantle hard-won rights in pursuit of a specific political and social vision.
It is crucial to acknowledge that a substantial portion of women, particularly white women, have voted for politicians who openly espouse views that undermine their own rights. The reasons behind this are complex and warrant further exploration, but the outcome is undeniable. The underlying problem is a disconnect between the ideals of equality and the realities of political power dynamics.
This potential for the removal of women’s right to vote shouldn’t be viewed in isolation. It’s part of a larger picture that includes restrictions on reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and other social freedoms. It’s not simply about votes; it’s about control. Control over women’s bodies, control over their choices, and ultimately control over their participation in society.
This situation should serve as a potent wake-up call. It’s not about hyperbole or exaggeration. It’s about recognizing the real and present danger posed by extremist ideologies that seek to redefine the rules of political engagement and to diminish the rights of specific segments of the population. It highlights the urgency of protecting and defending democratic principles, including the right to vote for all citizens, regardless of gender.
Finally, the argument that this isn’t the “first item on the agenda” or that it’s merely the view of a small, fringe group misses the point. The fact that such openly misogynistic ideas are voiced and discussed within the Christian Nationalist movement is a symptom of a larger issue: a blatant disregard for the fundamental principles of equal rights and democratic governance. While the immediate threat of repealing the 19th Amendment may seem improbable, the underlying attitudes and beliefs present a significant long-term danger to the social fabric of society. Ignoring this danger would be a grave mistake.