By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Yolanda Borucki, a childcare centre manager, was acquitted of computer hacking charges after reporting her colleague, Ashley Paul Griffith, to authorities. Despite initial dismissal of her concerns, Griffith was later convicted of 307 child sexual offences and sentenced to life imprisonment. The magistrate found insufficient evidence that Borucki acted without permission or caused significant harm by sharing information to alert the media. Borucki’s lawyer called her actions heroic, highlighting the need for an inquiry into how Griffith was allowed to work with children for so long.
Read the original article here
The childcare manager, lauded by many as a hero for exposing what some called “Australia’s worst paedophile,” has been found not guilty of hacking charges. This outcome, while a relief to her and her legal team, highlights a much larger issue: the chilling response from both the church and the police. Her lawyer rightly points out that the case should never have been pursued with such vigor, especially considering the gravity of the original offense she was attempting to bring to light. The lack of support she received speaks volumes about Australia’s notoriously inadequate whistleblower protections.
This case isn’t an isolated incident. We’ve seen similar situations unfold, where individuals who bravely expose wrongdoing face severe repercussions, often far exceeding the consequences for those they accuse. Consider the case of David McBride, an Australian Army lawyer jailed for leaking documents exposing war crimes; none of the soldiers implicated were ever prosecuted. Similarly, Samantha Crompvoets, a government consultant who detailed evidence of Australian SAS war crimes, has suffered years of harassment and threats, leading to the destruction of her professional life. This demonstrates a systemic issue where those who speak truth to power are penalized while those responsible for the crimes remain unaccountable.
The case of the Friendlyjordies producer, whose home was raided and who faced stalking charges for criticizing a government minister and the NSW Police, further underscores this trend. The charges were later dropped, exposing the potential use of police resources for intimidation and silencing dissent. The subsequent shutdown of the Fixated Persons unit, while seemingly a positive step, doesn’t erase the damage already done or address the underlying problem. The unit appeared to function as a tool to target whistleblowers and critics, operating more like a vendetta-driven squad than a legitimate law enforcement entity. This erosion of trust and the seemingly unchecked power wielded by certain elements within the police force raises concerns about Australia’s trajectory towards a police state.
The increasing prevalence of aggressive policing tactics, like the routine use of drug detection dogs at pubs, train stations, and music festivals, along with the widespread practice of strip searches (including of children), further fuels this concern. The reported inaccuracy of these dogs, coupled with allegations of falsified indications by handlers, reveals a system ripe for abuse. This blatant disregard for individual rights, combined with the passage of overly broad anti-protest laws and even the recent under-16s social media ban, all paint a disturbing picture. The seemingly greater focus on prosecuting the whistleblower than addressing the alleged crimes committed within the Uniting Church’s childcare facilities points to a troubling prioritization of protecting institutions over protecting vulnerable children.
The firebombing of Friendlyjordies’ producer’s home after a video exposing this situation only intensifies the concerns. The severity of the response directed at individuals exposing misconduct—far exceeding any action taken against the actual perpetrators—is shocking. It’s unclear the exact extent of the church’s involvement in pursuing charges against the childcare manager or whether the police were motivated by a desire for retribution. However, what is clear is the immense power imbalance at play; those who expose the dark underbelly of powerful institutions face significantly harsher treatment than those they accuse. The situation highlights a disturbing trend where systemic failures are met not with accountability but with a crackdown on those who dare to expose them. The impunity with which these actions can be taken is the heart of the matter, irrespective of the specific actors involved. This creates an environment where the lines between legitimate law enforcement and mafia-like tactics blur, leaving citizens vulnerable and silenced.