By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Stanford University study found that influenza A viruses can remain infectious in refrigerated raw milk for up to five days, highlighting a potential human health risk. This research, using an H1N1 strain, suggests raw milk is a viable transmission route for similar viruses, including the currently circulating H5N1 avian influenza affecting dairy cows. Pasteurization effectively eliminates the virus, emphasizing the importance of this process. The study’s findings underscore the dangers of raw milk consumption, particularly given the current H5N1 outbreaks and the persistence of raw milk’s popularity despite associated risks.
Read the original article here
Infectious bird flu viruses, specifically influenza A strains, can persist in refrigerated raw milk for up to five days. This surprising finding stems from recent research that examined the longevity of an H1N1 influenza A virus in refrigerated raw milk under conditions mimicking typical storage. The study used a viral dose comparable to that found in contaminated commercially available milk products.
This research is significant because it highlights a potential transmission route for bird flu, particularly given the current spread among dairy cows. The fact that the virus remained infectious for such an extended period in refrigerated conditions is a cause for concern. The risk, of course, is far greater for those who consume raw milk, emphasizing the importance of proper food safety practices and considering the potential health risks.
Importantly, the research also confirmed that pasteurization completely eliminates the infectious virus from milk. This underscores the protective effect of pasteurization and highlights the inherent dangers associated with consuming unpasteurized milk products. The five-day window of infectivity before the virus loses its potency in raw milk should serve as a stark reminder of the potential hazards.
The longevity of the virus in raw milk is particularly alarming given the current concerns about the spread of bird flu. While this study focused on a specific H1N1 strain, the findings suggest that other similar strains, including those of avian influenza, could exhibit similar persistence in raw milk. This possibility further emphasizes the need for caution regarding raw milk consumption.
The implications extend beyond individual health choices. The potential for raw milk to act as a vector for disease transmission poses a wider public health concern. The longer a potentially infectious agent like bird flu can survive, the greater the risk of wider spread through contaminated milk. This highlights the need for public health interventions and education.
The study’s methodology, which involved tracking the decline of viable virus levels in refrigerated raw milk over time, provides a clearer understanding of the risks associated with unpasteurized milk. This research, providing real-world data, contributes valuable insights into food safety and infectious disease transmission. The findings are a reminder of the role that food production practices play in preventing disease outbreaks.
Considering the potential severity of avian influenza, especially in vulnerable populations such as pregnant women and infants, the risks associated with consuming raw milk are simply too high. The easy availability of safe, pasteurized milk makes the choice to consume raw milk seem particularly reckless. The potential consequences outweigh any perceived benefits.
The discussions surrounding raw milk frequently involve strong opinions, with passionate advocates on both sides. However, the scientific evidence clearly demonstrates the potential for serious health risks associated with consuming raw milk. The research on the persistence of infectious bird flu in raw milk provides further compelling evidence to support the importance of pasteurization in ensuring food safety.
Ultimately, the five-day infectious period of bird flu in refrigerated raw milk highlights the need for continued research, rigorous food safety standards, and consumer education about the inherent risks of raw milk consumption. The potential for serious illness and even death underscores the importance of safe food handling practices and the benefits of choosing pasteurized milk. The research unequivocally demonstrates that the risks associated with raw milk consumption significantly outweigh any potential benefits. Pasteurization remains the safest and most effective method to ensure the safety of milk.