By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Donald Trump’s victory resulted from a coalition of traditional and non-traditional Republican voters, including a significant number of Latino voters who prioritized economic issues above all else. Trump’s ability to retain this coalition hinges on his capacity to maintain the support of these Latino voters, potentially by taking credit for President Biden’s successful economic policies. Biden’s substantial infrastructure investments, while designed to benefit Trump’s supporters, might ironically bolster Trump’s image. However, Trump’s potential repeal of these policies could jeopardize the very economic growth that fueled his election.
Read the original article here
Biden’s economic policies, implemented after inheriting a challenging situation, have undeniably yielded significant positive results. However, the likelihood of Donald Trump receiving credit for these achievements is unfortunately high.
This isn’t simply a matter of partisan bias; it’s a consequence of how quickly people perceive economic changes and how effectively certain individuals can manipulate public perception. Small, immediate economic shifts, like a temporary drop in the price of eggs, can be easily seized upon and presented as evidence of a larger positive trend, even if that trend is unrelated to current policy.
Trump’s communication style, characterized by bold assertions and unwavering self-promotion, perfectly complements this strategy. His ability to dominate the news cycle with declarative statements about economic improvements allows him to bypass nuanced reporting and create a narrative that connects unrelated positive occurrences to his own actions or to his administration.
This effective manipulation of the news cycle isn’t limited to short-term economic fluctuations. The long-term benefits of economic policies often take years to materialize fully, making it easy to forget who initiated the underlying changes. Four years of hard work could easily be overshadowed by a cleverly crafted claim from Trump, leaving the public associating success with the more recent, more visible figure.
This isn’t to say Trump won’t make his own impact on the economy. The possibility of policies that could reverse Biden’s progress is significant. Furthermore, the historical pattern of Republicans inheriting improved economies and then taking credit, while leaving a damaged economy for Democrats to repair, suggests a cycle that could repeat.
The challenge, therefore, isn’t just about who deserves credit, but about who the public will *believe* deserves credit. Biden’s administration, perhaps lacking the same level of aggressive self-promotion, might struggle to effectively communicate its achievements to a public easily swayed by soundbites and memorable rhetoric.
Even if the long-term economic data definitively proves Biden’s positive impact, the short-term perception of success might be effectively controlled by others. A sharp economic downturn, regardless of its origins, could be readily attributed to Biden, effectively erasing the memory of prior successes. This short-term focus could overshadow years of positive work, even to the point of rewriting the history of this economic period in the public consciousness.
This dynamic, unfortunately, points to a system where effective communication, and arguably effective self-promotion, are as important as effective policy implementation. While the effectiveness of Biden’s policies might be undeniable in the eyes of economists and historians, the popular narrative could easily be controlled by those adept at exploiting the limitations of public understanding and memory.
This scenario underscores the crucial need for clear, consistent, and easily understandable communication of economic achievements, highlighting the long-term consequences of political decisions. Without such effective communication, however, even substantial achievements can be quickly forgotten, leaving the stage for those who excel at claiming credit, regardless of actual contributions. The inherent lag between policy implementation and noticeable results, coupled with the power of effective communication, might ultimately mean that Trump, even if undeserving, could still receive disproportionate credit for economic improvements during Biden’s term.