By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Biden issued a full pardon to his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, reversing his prior statements against doing so. This decision, made over the weekend, followed Hunter Biden’s convictions and plea agreements, and the President cited concerns about a politically motivated prosecution. Biden argued his son was unfairly targeted due to his familial connection, emphasizing Hunter’s recovery from addiction. The pardon prevents Hunter Biden from serving any jail time.
Read the original article here
President Biden is reportedly set to issue a pardon for his son, Hunter Biden. This anticipated action has ignited a firestorm of reactions, ranging from outrage to fervent support, largely along partisan lines.
The decision is viewed by many as a preemptive measure against the potential for politically motivated prosecutions under a future Trump administration. The argument is that Hunter Biden, facing various legal challenges, would likely be subjected to a harsher, more aggressive legal process under a Trump presidency, irrespective of the merits of the charges.
Many believe that pardoning Hunter Biden is a strategic move to protect him from what they see as politically driven vengeance. The rationale is that a Trump administration, known for its aggressive pursuit of political opponents, would weaponize the justice system to persecute Hunter Biden, not for the sake of justice, but for political gain.
This action is seen by some as a necessary countermeasure to the perceived imbalance in the current political landscape. The argument centers on the idea that the previous administration’s actions, including pardons and the handling of various legal cases, have shattered established norms of conduct.
Some argue that the anticipated pardon is a necessary response to the unprecedented level of partisan warfare that has characterized recent political events. They believe that the current environment has made a fair and unbiased legal process for Hunter Biden impossible to guarantee.
The move is viewed by some as a necessary preemptive strike against potential political retribution. With a Trump presidency likely to prioritize pursuing his political enemies, the fear is that Hunter Biden would be targeted disproportionately.
The pardon is also viewed by some as a reflection of the current political climate, where ethical standards and established norms seem to be increasingly disregarded. In this context, the pardon becomes less about the individual case and more about the larger battle for political dominance.
The rationale behind this perspective emphasizes the erosion of trust in governmental institutions and the perception that the justice system is increasingly being manipulated for political purposes.
The anticipated pardon has also generated significant debate regarding the precedent it sets. Many express concern over the potential implications of a president using their power to pardon a family member, regardless of political motivations.
However, many counter this argument by pointing to previous instances of presidents pardoning family members or associates, suggesting that the act itself, while ethically questionable, is not without precedent.
The impending pardon is expected to further polarize the nation, with supporters celebrating it as a necessary defense against political persecution, while critics condemn it as an abuse of power and a blatant disregard for the rule of law.
The reaction to the potential pardon from the opposing political spectrum is likely to be highly critical, framing it as an act of corruption and abuse of power. This polarization further exemplifies the current climate of intense political division.
Ultimately, President Biden’s reported decision to pardon his son is likely to be interpreted through the lens of ongoing political struggles, making it a highly divisive and symbolically charged event. The long-term implications remain to be seen but are sure to generate significant debate.