By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the December 25th crash of an Azerbaijan Airlines plane in Kazakhstan, which killed 38, President Aliyev demanded a formal apology, admission of guilt, prosecution of those responsible, and compensation from Russia. While Russian President Putin offered an apology for the “tragic incident,” he did not concede Russian guilt. Azerbaijan Airlines attributed the crash to external physical and technical factors. Aliyev’s demands represent Azerbaijan’s pursuit of accountability for the incident.
Read the original article here
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s demand for compensation and an admission of guilt from Russia regarding a downed Azerbaijani plane is a complex issue, fueled by a history of strained relations and shifting geopolitical alliances. The incident itself highlights the precariousness of the region and the power dynamics at play. The demand is not simply about financial recompense; it’s a statement of Azerbaijan’s growing assertiveness on the world stage.
The demand underscores Azerbaijan’s position of strength. Russia’s weakened standing, particularly due to its ongoing war in Ukraine and its dwindling influence, leaves it vulnerable to pressure from countries like Azerbaijan. This vulnerability is further exacerbated by Azerbaijan’s strategic location, its importance as a transit route, and its relatively strong military capabilities, including a proven proficiency in drone warfare.
The potential for compensation is not just about money; it’s a measure of Russia’s willingness to acknowledge responsibility and to repair the damage to bilateral relations. The lack of an immediate, full-scale response from Russia suggests a recognition of their weakened position and the potential risks of escalating the situation further. The silence itself, in the face of such a direct demand, speaks volumes.
However, the context of this demand extends beyond the immediate incident. Azerbaijan’s recent successes in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, with Russia seemingly unable to fully support Armenia, have significantly boosted Azerbaijan’s confidence and leverage. This victory, coupled with supportive relations with Turkey, strengthens Azerbaijan’s hand in negotiations with Russia.
The comments highlighting the possibility of Russian aggression are important to consider, but also underscore the inherent risks of this situation. While Azerbaijan benefits from its improved geopolitical position, any escalation of the conflict with Russia could have significant consequences. The potential for additional conflicts, fueled by nationalistic fervor on both sides, adds further complexity to the situation.
The muted Russian response also reveals a reluctance to directly antagonize Azerbaijan given their current geopolitical circumstances. A significant escalation would likely divert resources from the Ukraine conflict, further straining already limited resources. The Kremlin faces a delicate balancing act, attempting to maintain a semblance of control while simultaneously navigating the significant economic and political ramifications of the war in Ukraine.
Aliyev’s demand is more than a simple financial claim; it’s a calculated move to solidify Azerbaijan’s newfound regional power. The success of this demand will likely be heavily influenced by several factors, including the extent of Russia’s internal struggles and the continued support Azerbaijan receives from its international allies.
The underlying narrative surrounding the incident, which may not be entirely accurate, adds yet another layer to this complex geopolitical situation. Accusations of ethnic cleansing and other such matters are indeed relevant in understanding the broader context of the relationship between Azerbaijan and Russia. These historical tensions may influence how Russia responds, or chooses not to respond, to Azerbaijan’s demands.
This situation also exemplifies the volatile nature of international relations and the shifting balance of power in a region historically marked by instability. The demand serves as a powerful reminder of the enduring impact of past conflicts and the complex web of political and economic interests that shape the present. Ultimately, the resolution of this situation will serve as a crucial indicator of the changing geopolitical landscape of the region and the long-term implications for regional stability.