By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The 2024 US presidential election saw high turnout, yet an estimated 90 million eligible Americans did not vote—a number exceeding the votes for either major candidate. Many non-voters cited the Electoral College as rendering their votes insignificant in their respective states. Other reasons included dissatisfaction with both candidates, a perception that neither represented working-class interests, and policy disagreements, particularly regarding the candidates’ stances on issues like Israel and climate change. Finally, some expressed disillusionment with the two-party system and extreme political polarization.
Read the original article here
The staggering number of nearly 90 million eligible US voters who didn’t participate in the 2024 presidential election is a deeply concerning figure, exceeding the number of votes cast for either Trump or Harris. This widespread abstention speaks volumes about the current state of political engagement and the disconnect between many citizens and the electoral process.
A common sentiment echoed among those who chose not to vote centers on a feeling of disillusionment and apathy. The political landscape is often described as a “circus,” a chaotic and frustrating spectacle where neither candidate seems to genuinely represent the electorate’s needs or aspirations. This sense of being unrepresented fuels a deep-seated frustration, leading many to believe their vote is inconsequential.
This perceived lack of influence is exacerbated by a feeling that the existing two-party system is broken and fundamentally incapable of addressing the pressing issues facing the nation. The desire for a significant overhaul of the political system, a call for something fundamentally different, is prevalent among non-voters. Many express a desire for more authentic representation and a rejection of the perceived limitations and compromises inherent within the current system.
The anxieties surrounding the future are keenly felt, especially by parents who worry about the kind of country their children will inherit. This fear is palpable and underscores the gravity of the situation; the inaction of many reflects a deep-seated concern about the trajectory of the nation. Yet, this concern is not always translated into active participation in the electoral process.
However, the consequences of non-participation are not lost on everyone. Many commentators express frustration with those who didn’t vote, highlighting the potential impact of their inaction. The argument is frequently made that not voting essentially amounts to a vote for the status quo, bolstering the power of more extreme elements within the political spectrum. Apathy is viewed as a tacit endorsement of the existing system, regardless of whether the non-voter intends such an outcome.
It’s suggested that this high abstention rate could be strategically exploited by certain political groups, who seek to discourage participation in order to manipulate election outcomes. In other words, if they cannot persuade people to vote *for* them, their next best option is to ensure that those people do not vote at all.
Furthermore, systemic barriers to voting contribute to this large number of non-voters. Difficulties in voter registration, long lines at polling stations, and restrictive voting laws disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and marginalized communities. This creates a significant hurdle for many who might otherwise be inclined to vote. The impact of such barriers is substantial and cannot be disregarded when discussing why so many Americans abstained from participating.
Critiques of non-voters often devolve into accusations of laziness, ignorance, or selfishness. However, reducing their actions to such simplistic explanations avoids acknowledging the complexities involved. The issue is not solely one of individual responsibility, but also highlights broader systemic problems within the political system that must be addressed.
The lack of political participation also affects the daily lives of citizens. Issues like healthcare access, fair wages, environmental protection, and consumer rights are all interconnected with the political process. Abstention results in a forfeiture of the ability to advocate for improvements in these areas. By not voting, individuals effectively relinquish their voice and influence in shaping their own lives and the future of their community.
There is also a disconnect between the perceived impact of a single vote and the reality of collective action. The common refrain, “My vote doesn’t matter,” overlooks the collective power of numerous votes. While any single vote might seem insignificant in isolation, the combined effect of millions of votes can profoundly shape election outcomes. The aggregation of individual voices is what makes up collective action and the potential for change.
In conclusion, the massive number of non-voters in the 2024 election is a serious matter that demands a more thorough and nuanced examination. It’s a multi-faceted problem stemming from various factors—systemic issues within the voting process, a deep sense of disillusionment with the political system, and a perceived lack of influence. While individual responsibility plays a role, addressing the larger issues within the political landscape is essential to fostering greater participation and a more representative democracy. Ignoring this would simply perpetuate the cycle of disengagement and dissatisfaction.