By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite some limited progress by Israel in increasing humanitarian aid to Gaza, the Biden administration has not yet determined if Israel is in violation of U.S. law. While acknowledging some positive steps, the administration maintains that the humanitarian situation in Gaza requires significant improvement. This decision follows a month-long ultimatum from the U.S., urging Israel to increase aid flow or face potential consequences. The U.S. remains Israel’s largest arms supplier and its key ally, but has expressed concerns about the dire conditions in Gaza and the lack of access for humanitarian organizations. The U.S. continues to press Israel to increase aid flow and ensure better humanitarian access, particularly in northern Gaza, which has been cut off from food for over a month.
Read the original article here
The US has stated that it will not limit arms transfers to Israel, despite claims that aid flow to Gaza has improved. This declaration has sparked outrage and frustration among many, who see it as a betrayal of international law and a continuation of US complicity in Israeli actions.
The claim that aid flow to Gaza has improved is met with skepticism and outright dismissal. Reports from the UN indicate that aid delivery is at an all-time low, and Israel has even blocked the primary supplier of aid from the region without offering a replacement. These actions seem to contradict the Biden administration’s assertion of progress. The administration’s claim that there have been improvements, despite a lack of evidence to support it, is seen by some as a desperate attempt to save face and appease a powerful ally.
The administration’s decision to maintain arms transfers, even in the face of demonstrably low aid levels, appears to be motivated by a desire to maintain a strong relationship with Israel, regardless of the human cost. This is perceived by many as a blatant disregard for the plight of the Palestinian people, whose suffering is exacerbated by the ongoing blockade of Gaza.
This decision to prioritize the arms industry over the welfare of Palestinian civilians is seen as a continuation of the US’s long history of turning a blind eye to Israeli abuses. Critics argue that the US has a moral obligation to hold Israel accountable for its actions, especially given its close relationship with the country and the significant amount of financial and military aid it provides. They are calling for a complete cessation of US aid to Israel, including the suspension of all arms transfers.
The situation in Gaza remains dire, with residents facing a humanitarian crisis, and the US’s decision to continue supplying Israel with arms only serves to perpetuate this cycle of suffering. The lack of action, despite the pleas from human rights organizations and the outcry from many citizens, is a disheartening reminder of the US’s unwavering commitment to Israel, even at the expense of Palestinian lives. This decision is seen by many as a stark betrayal of American values and principles, and a chilling reminder of the deep-seated inequalities that continue to plague the world.