By John Q. Hosedrinker 
US officials have reported approximately 8,000 North Korean troops stationed in Russia’s Kursk region, who are likely to enter the war with Ukraine. According to Ukrainian intelligence, Moscow has armed these troops with various weapons, including 60mm mortars, AK-12 rifles, RPK/PKM machine guns, SVD/SVF sniper rifles, Phoenix anti-tank guided missiles, and RPG-7s. The troops have also been provided with night vision equipment, thermal imagers, sights, and binoculars, suggesting the weaponry to be similar to that used by Russian forces. A previously released video showed North Korean troops in Russian gear at a training compound. Predicted to join the fight against Ukraine soon, these developments have led Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to call on Western allies to lift long-range weaponry restrictions.
Read the original article here
Ukrainian intelligence has recently brought attention to a dire situation unfolding in the theater of war, namely that Moscow is arming North Korean troops with equipment ranging from Dragunov sniper rifles to thermal imagers. The implications of this alliance are indeed troubling, and as I sift through the details, a slew of thoughts rushes into my mind about the gravity of this development.
The Dragunov sniper rifle, while iconic in its own right, is fundamentally a relic of the Soviet era—barely a step above outdated. In the hands of soldiers who are not accurately trained and who may even lack basic sustenance, it becomes a more poignant representation of the disparities in modern warfare than a practical asset. The irony of well-trained Ukrainian troops facing off against conscripts armed with essentially antiquated systems makes me question the validity of strategy behind such decisions. It may sound tempting to dismiss the threat posed by North Korean troops as mere cannon fodder, but I believe that underestimating them could lead to tragic consequences.
These North Korean soldiers may not be the highly trained elite that their government portrays, yet they possess a brutal resilience shaped by a lifetime of indoctrination. Their experience, though lacking in recent combat, is interwoven with an ideology of unwavering loyalty to Kim Jong-un. This raises a question: can we really rate their effectiveness based solely on their equipment? The reality on the ground might be far grimmer. If Ukrainian intelligence proves correct, these troops could be part of sniper squads directly opposing Ukrainian forces, and that could change the dynamics of engagement.
The notion that these soldiers are willing participants in a gamble—trading their loyalty for food—is chilling. The supplies of weapons, although vintage and possibly rusty, indicate a deeper collaboration that aims to bolster Russia’s capacity. In times of war, even substandard equipment in the right hands can become deadly. The provision of thermal imagers might just tip the scales further, offering North Korean troops a combat advantage despite their other disadvantages. It’s disheartening to think that they could become adept at specific combat roles that would allow them to inflict more damage than anticipated.
There’s something particularly twisted about equipping a starving force with weapons that have seen better days while they tread into a crisis simultaneously exacerbated by a lack of resources and proper logistics. The optics of it all scream desperation, not just for North Korea but also for Russia, seeking to buffer their forces with whatever they can muster. Why provide such equipment to forces clearly perceived as expendable? Perhaps it’s a marker of Russia’s intent to show a united front, even if that front appears riddled with barely functional arms and ill-prepared troopers.
As the conflict escalates, we take a moment to acknowledge the cold truth: war dehumanizes. I find myself wrestling with the thought that while many people tend to downplay the role of North Korean troops, these are lives on the line. The loss of life isn’t a statistic; it’s a series of personal tragedies, irreparable scars on families and communities. Each dead soldier, regardless of where they hail from, serves as a reminder of the futility and brutality that pervades conflict. I remember feeling a strange mix of bitterness and empathy as I consider that each side possesses its own tragedies, with the victims caught in the middle of macro-political games.
Accusations and dismissive comments often emerge about the supposed elite status of North Korean forces. However, as the reality of their situation unfolds, I presume that an organization struggling with malnourishment and lack of experience will be hard-pressed to perform at levels expected of elite troops. The juxtaposition of advanced military technology against the backdrop of inadequate training and understanding only paints a more chaotic picture. The potential for miscommunication adds yet another layer of absurdity, as North Korean soldiers attempt to engage in combat, brandishing antique weapons and caught in the throes of an archaic military mindset.
This grim tale is not only about military equipment but also poignant reflections on the absurdity of war itself. In the midst of all this chaos, I can only wonder: are we witnessing the unfolding of new alliances born from desperation? Will North Korea find itself at the mercy of its own decisions, acting as pawns in a game far grander than themselves? To sit back and watch this situation evolve is to grapple with my own helplessness, observing nations embroiled in vendetta, ultimately sacrificing human lives in the process.