By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Democracy Now! is committed to providing in-depth coverage of the post-election landscape and the impact of the incoming Trump administration. As an independent news source, we rely solely on viewer support to bring you alternative voices and analysis you won’t find elsewhere. We are asking for your contribution of $15 today, which will be doubled by a generous donor, to ensure we can continue providing this vital coverage for the future. Your support makes a real difference.
Read the original article here
Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. military has tattoos linked to white supremacists and Nazis. This news has sparked outrage and a wave of criticism, raising concerns about the potential influence of extremist ideologies within the highest ranks of the armed forces.
The tattoos in question include the Jerusalem Cross, a symbol often associated with Christian nationalists and groups with anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish sentiments. This specific symbol, coupled with other tattoos, has raised serious questions about the nominee’s potential biases and affiliations.
Many critics point out that the nominee’s tattoos are not just harmless symbols, but represent a dangerous ideology that has no place in the military, an institution that should uphold neutrality and protect the rights of all citizens. They argue that the presence of such extremist symbols on the body of someone entrusted with leading the U.S. military is a major red flag and a cause for deep concern.
Some commenters suggest that the nominee’s tattoos are merely a manifestation of a far-right Christian worldview and not necessarily a direct link to white supremacist or Nazi ideologies. However, the overwhelming consensus is that these tattoos represent a worrying connection to extremist groups, especially given the nominee’s past involvement with the military and his alleged ties to individuals with known extremist backgrounds.
The controversy surrounding the nominee’s tattoos highlights the ongoing struggle to address the influence of extremist ideologies within the military. There’s a growing concern that these ideologies, often concealed under the guise of patriotism and religious devotion, could pose a serious threat to the integrity and values of the U.S. armed forces.
This situation underscores the importance of rigorous vetting procedures for individuals seeking positions of power within the military. It also emphasizes the need for increased awareness and vigilance in combating the infiltration of extremist ideologies into any branch of the armed forces. The future of the U.S. military, and its commitment to upholding democratic values, hangs in the balance.