President-elect Trump’s selection of Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, along with other national security appointments, signals a significant shift in US foreign policy. Senior military commanders express concern that this “America First” approach, prioritizing deals over alliances, could weaken the US-led global order and jeopardize security commitments to allies like Ukraine and Taiwan. Trump’s transactional worldview, viewing adversaries and allies as equally negotiable, may lead to instability and a new nuclear arms race. This approach, harkening back to pre-World War II isolationism, could have dire consequences in a world increasingly interconnected by global challenges like climate change and cyber threats.

Read the original article here

The appointment of Matt Gaetz as Attorney General has sent shockwaves through the military and intelligence communities, eliciting strong reactions from senior commanders. Many view this appointment, along with other controversial picks like Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence and Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, as a recipe for disaster.

The concern stems from the perceived lack of experience and qualifications of these individuals, who are seen as loyalists rather than competent leaders. The fear is that their lack of expertise will lead to detrimental policy decisions, potentially jeopardizing national security.

There’s a palpable sense of dread among those who see these cabinet appointments as a sign of the impending downfall of the nation. Some argue that the military and intelligence services must take a stand to prevent the catastrophic consequences of such appointments. Others feel a sense of helplessness, recognizing that the current political climate allows for such appointments without any meaningful resistance.

Many are questioning how individuals like Gaetz, who have faced serious allegations and lack the necessary experience, could even be considered for such critical roles. The appointments are seen as a slap in the face to those who have dedicated their lives to serving the country. There’s a growing sense of disillusionment with the political process, fueled by the belief that unqualified individuals are being rewarded with positions of power for their unwavering loyalty to a figure who seems intent on dismantling the very institutions that safeguard the nation.

The anxiety is further amplified by the prospect of Trump’s policies, particularly his foreign policy moves. The potential for withdrawing troops from Europe and Asia, along with the prospect of selling military equipment to adversaries like Russia and China, is seen as incredibly dangerous.

The overall sentiment is one of profound unease and despair. There’s a feeling that the nation is on a trajectory toward chaos and instability, with the new cabinet appointments serving as a harbinger of the impending storm. There’s a sense that the only way to stop this downward spiral is for those in positions of authority to stand up and say “enough is enough.” However, the lack of resistance from those in power only reinforces the belief that the nation is hurtling towards a future filled with peril and uncertainty.