By John Q. Hosedrinker 
With President-elect Trump’s victory, the two federal cases against him are likely to be dismissed or delayed due to a longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Jack Smith is taking steps to conclude both cases before Trump takes office. The cases include charges related to election interference in Washington, D.C., and the alleged mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, Florida. While the latter case presents a more complex situation due to the involvement of other defendants and the potential impact on future special counsel appointments, the Justice Department may choose to abandon the appeal.
Read the original article here
Special Counsel Jack Smith, tasked with investigating former President Donald Trump, is reportedly taking steps to wind down the federal cases against him. This move has sparked outrage and disappointment among many, who see it as a sign of Trump’s escape from accountability for his alleged crimes.
The potential for Trump to pardon himself and his associates in the various cases against him has fueled fears that he will remain above the law. The perception of Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, as “useless” has taken hold among those who believe he has failed to pursue justice against Trump. Critics argue that the drawn-out investigations have given Trump the opportunity to escape any meaningful consequences.
The concern is that Trump will now be able to continue his alleged criminal behavior with impunity, potentially eroding the rule of law and further deepening the political divide. Some fear that the decision to wind down the cases will embolden Trump, leading to further chaos and instability.
While supporters of Trump celebrate this outcome, others are grappling with the implications of this apparent escape from justice. They are questioning the integrity of the legal system, expressing concerns about the potential for a repeat of Trump’s actions and the long-term damage to the nation’s democracy.
The move has also sparked debate about the role of the Department of Justice and the need for swift and decisive action in cases involving high-profile individuals. Many are calling for a more robust response to Trump’s alleged crimes, arguing that allowing him to escape accountability sends a dangerous message.
Despite the disappointment and anger, some are hoping that the evidence gathered during the investigations will be preserved, allowing for the cases to be reopened at a later date. The hope is that Trump’s escape from justice will be temporary, and that he will eventually be held accountable for his alleged crimes. However, with the political landscape as divided as it is, it remains uncertain what the future holds for Trump and the investigations against him.