By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President-elect Trump’s transition team plans to deviate from the standard FBI background checks for some of his Cabinet picks, opting for private companies instead. This decision stems from a belief that the FBI process is slow and prone to political manipulation. While the president ultimately decides who receives intelligence access, circumventing traditional background checks is a departure from Washington norms. The move reflects Trump’s distrust of the national security establishment and raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest, particularly regarding controversial nominees like Matt Gaetz and Tulsi Gabbard, who have faced prior investigations and criticism for their stances on foreign policy.
Read the original article here
The revelation that Trump’s team skipped FBI background checks for some of his Cabinet picks is a deeply troubling development. This decision raises serious concerns about the integrity and competence of the incoming administration, and it appears to be a clear indication of a disregard for established norms and procedures.
The rationale for skipping these checks is that the FBI process is slow and intrusive, and that it sometimes uncovers embarrassing information used to inflict political damage. However, these concerns are overshadowed by the critical importance of ensuring that individuals entrusted with positions of power are thoroughly vetted.
The potential risks of not conducting proper background checks are significant. These checks are crucial for identifying individuals with potential conflicts of interest, ties to foreign governments, or histories of criminal activity. Skipping these checks is tantamount to inviting potential scandals and compromised national security.
It’s also worth noting that the idea that the FBI is out to “get” Trump’s picks is highly suspect. The FBI’s mandate is to ensure the security of the United States, and that includes ensuring that those appointed to high-level positions are fit to hold those offices.
This decision to circumvent standard background checks is yet another example of the Trump administration’s disdain for established norms and procedures. It is a dangerous trend that undermines the very foundation of democratic governance.
The lack of transparency around this decision further fuels suspicions that there are skeletons in the closets of Trump’s appointees. The American public deserves to know who is being entrusted with their security and well-being.
It’s appalling that, in an era of increasingly complex global threats, the administration would prioritize speed over thoroughness when it comes to vetting its top officials. The implications of this decision are far-reaching and potentially disastrous. The lack of accountability and the blatant disregard for established processes are deeply concerning.
This move is not just a procedural misstep; it’s a symptom of a deeper problem – a willingness to prioritize personal gain and loyalty over national security and the public good.
The administration’s actions are not just a matter of political maneuvering; they represent a fundamental challenge to the principles of good governance. This is not a partisan issue; it’s an attack on the very foundations of a functioning democracy.
In the face of this blatant disregard for transparency and due process, the public must hold those in power accountable. Silence is not an option. The American people deserve better than this.