By Matt Underwood The news of Donald Trump choosing Tulsi Gabbard as his Director of National Intelligence sent shockwaves through the political landscape. Many people expressed outrage and disbelief, pointing to Gabbard’s perceived ties to Russia and her past pronouncements on Ukraine.
The comments highlighted Gabbard’s history of echoing Kremlin-approved narratives on issues like the war in Ukraine and her acceptance of campaign donations from alleged Russian agents. This, coupled with Trump’s known admiration for Vladimir Putin, fueled fears of a potential Russian takeover of US intelligence.
The internet erupted in a wave of despair and anger, with users lamenting the potential consequences of such an appointment. Some users expressed concern for American intelligence sources, fearing that sensitive information could be leaked to Russia. Others questioned the competence of both Trump and Gabbard, suggesting that this move was a blatant act of treason.
Many felt that this appointment was a significant step towards a US-Russia alliance, with some even suggesting a Russian invasion of Ukraine as a possible outcome. Others pointed out the worrying parallels to the Trump-Russia collusion scandal, which had already shaken the nation.
The appointment was widely perceived as a disastrous move, highlighting the potential dangers of allowing individuals with foreign ties to hold positions of power within the US government. Some users even called for a military coup to prevent a complete Russian takeover of American intelligence.
The general sentiment was one of fear and disbelief, with many questioning the future of the United States under such leadership. The appointment, while hypothetical, served as a stark reminder of the potential threats posed by foreign interference in American politics.