By John Q. Hosedrinker 
My Supreme Court victory in *Trump v. United States* secured a historic win on presidential immunity, crucial in countering the “lawfare” attacks against me and the MAGA movement. During arguments, I successfully argued for broad presidential immunity, even extending to hypothetical scenarios involving actions such as assassinations. While acknowledging hypotheticals, my position maintained that such actions, if deemed “official acts,” would fall under this immunity. This ruling is a key defense against politically motivated legal challenges.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s nomination of D. John Sauer as the next solicitor general is a deeply unsettling development. Sauer, remember, is the attorney who argued, successfully, that a president has the power to assassinate political rivals with impunity. This isn’t just a legal opinion; it’s a chilling statement about the disregard for the rule of law.
This appointment isn’t merely alarming; it feels like a direct assault on the very foundations of American justice. Sauer’s previous successes in defending Trump, particularly in the presidential immunity case before the Supreme Court, have already weakened other legal battles against him. This includes the attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. Now, Sauer will oversee all federal lawsuits, effectively putting a man who actively worked to shield Trump from accountability in a position to control the legal outcomes of future cases against him.
It’s a disturbing pattern. It suggests a deliberate effort to install loyalists who will protect Trump from the consequences of his actions. It’s a blatant disregard for the principles of justice and fairness. The very notion of someone arguing for the unchecked power to eliminate political opponents, and then being rewarded with a position of immense legal authority, is profoundly disturbing.
It’s tempting to feel outrage, but beyond that initial reaction lies a deeper, more troubling concern: the apparent normalization of such behavior. The fact that this nomination, with its inherent implications, elicits reactions ranging from resignation to grim acceptance speaks volumes about the current political climate.
People voted for Trump despite these alarming tendencies, knowing his history. This underscores a worrying apathy towards the deterioration of democratic norms and the erosion of checks and balances. This appointment is yet another step toward undermining the very institutions meant to safeguard the rule of law.
The sheer audacity of this move is astonishing. It’s as if Trump is openly flaunting his disregard for the legal system. The appointment of Sauer sends a clear message: justice is now subservient to political expediency. It’s a cynical move that highlights the increasing fragility of democratic institutions.
Many are expressing fears about the implications for future investigations and prosecutions. The fact that the person responsible for defending Trump from legal challenges now has the power to oversee all federal lawsuits casts a long, ominous shadow over the entire judicial process.
The potential consequences extend beyond the immediate legal implications. The erosion of trust in government institutions is a severe threat to societal stability. When the highest levels of power openly disregard the rule of law, it breeds cynicism and distrust, making it harder for citizens to believe in the fairness and impartiality of the system.
The broader context is equally alarming. This appointment isn’t an isolated event; it’s part of a larger pattern of actions aimed at undermining democratic norms. This includes attacking the media, the judiciary, and even the electoral process itself. This isn’t just a political battle; it’s a fight for the soul of American democracy.
The silence from certain quarters is equally disturbing. The lack of significant pushback from those who claim to uphold the rule of law is a worrying indicator of a system that may be failing under the weight of partisan politics and a growing disregard for democratic principles.
In essence, this appointment is a symptom of a far larger illness afflicting the American body politic. It’s a stark reminder of the fragility of democratic systems and the constant vigilance required to protect them. The appointment of Sauer isn’t just a legal matter; it’s a profound challenge to the fundamental values upon which the nation is founded. The consequences of this choice will likely be felt for years to come.