By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President-elect Donald Trump has announced the creation of a new “Department of Government Efficiency,” to be led by billionaire Elon Musk and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy. The office will focus on eliminating waste and fraud in government spending, with Musk and Ramaswamy acting as advisors to the White House and the Office of Budget & Management. While Congress holds the power to create federal agencies, the President-elect could also appoint the duo under the Federal Advisory Committees Act, allowing them to remain advisors outside of the traditional federal employee structure. This new department, with its focus on transparency and efficiency, is intended to be a major initiative aimed at reforming government spending and operations.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump, the former president, has appointed his “first buddy” Elon Musk to head a new, seemingly fabricated government department. This department, dubbed the “DOGE Department,” is supposed to focus on “efficiency” and “eliminating waste” in government spending. The name, a clear reference to the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, is a blatant indication of the unconventional and arguably unserious nature of this venture.
Musk’s involvement, alongside fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy, in this “department” raises eyebrows, particularly considering their extensive business dealings with the government. Many see this as a blatant conflict of interest, as these two individuals stand to gain financially from a department tasked with overseeing government spending.
This “DOGE Department” has no official legal standing and lacks the authority to create new agencies or policies. However, it operates under the umbrella of the Federal Advisory Committees Act, allowing Trump to appoint these individuals as advisors without the usual legal requirements for disclosure of conflicts of interest. This further fuels suspicion that the department is merely a smokescreen for self-serving financial maneuvering.
Some speculate that the department is simply a publicity stunt, a means to generate buzz for Dogecoin and elevate Musk’s profile. Others believe it is a clever tactic for Trump to funnel government funds to his allies, disguised as a “cost-cutting” initiative. The department’s lack of transparency and its reliance on a “leaderboard” for “insanely dumb spending” suggests a whimsical, rather than practical, approach to government oversight.
The creation of this seemingly fake department has sparked widespread criticism and ridicule. Many view it as a symptom of a deeper issue: the erosion of public trust in government and the growing influence of wealthy individuals in politics. The lack of checks and balances surrounding this “department” and the potential for corruption are significant concerns.
While some argue that the department could potentially identify wasteful spending if conducted honestly, the lack of legal structure and the potential for self-serving motives suggest it is more likely to be a vehicle for personal gain rather than public service. The “DOGE Department” serves as a stark example of the erosion of political norms and the increasing influence of wealthy individuals in shaping government policies.