By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Under a potential Ajit Pai-esque chairmanship by Brendan Carr, the FCC’s direction would drastically shift. This includes deregulation of internet service providers, potentially at the expense of increased regulation and financial burdens on Big Tech companies. Furthermore, a Carr-led FCC might target news organizations deemed critical of the administration and prioritize funding for projects like Elon Musk’s Starlink, potentially disregarding existing regulatory decisions. The FCC chair’s significant authority, as outlined by Carr himself, underscores the potential for sweeping changes under his leadership.
Read the original article here
Trump just chose Brendan Carr for FCC chief, and this appointment signals a significant threat to net neutrality. Carr’s documented history reveals a staunch opposition to net neutrality protections, suggesting a rollback of existing regulations is highly probable under his leadership.
This appointment, announced on a Sunday night, arguably aimed to minimize immediate public attention, a tactic that raises eyebrows regarding transparency and the administration’s intentions. The timing itself suggests a calculated effort to avoid intense scrutiny and public outcry.
Carr’s past actions and statements further solidify this prediction. His authorship of the FCC chapter in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a conservative policy blueprint, already hinted at his policy inclinations. This document outlines plans that directly contradict the principles of net neutrality, signifying his commitment to dismantling those protections.
Carr’s close ties to Elon Musk also raise significant concerns. His outspoken support for Musk’s endeavors, including advocating for broadband subsidies for Starlink, suggests a potential conflict of interest and a prioritization of corporate interests over the public good. This could lead to favorable treatment for Starlink, potentially at the expense of other internet providers and consumers.
The appointment is particularly troubling given Carr’s previous criticisms of the Biden administration’s efforts to expand broadband access, which he deemed “administrative regulatory overreach.” This stance demonstrates a clear preference for deregulation, further jeopardizing net neutrality and potentially hindering efforts to bridge the digital divide. His vocal opposition to initiatives aimed at making broadband more accessible to all Americans speaks volumes about his priorities.
His history of aligning himself with conservative narratives and attacking those he sees as opponents also presents a worrying picture. His accusations against Adam Schiff and the alleged bias of social media platforms against the Trump campaign point to a predisposition towards partisan politics influencing his decision-making. This raises concerns about fairness and impartiality in his role as FCC chief.
Carr’s stance on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act also adds to the apprehension. His desire for changes to this act, which protects online platforms from liability for user-generated content, further threatens freedom of speech and could lead to increased online censorship. His views suggest a willingness to curtail online expression under the guise of combating perceived biases.
Beyond the immediate impact on net neutrality, Carr’s appointment could have far-reaching consequences. The potential for increased regulatory capture, with lobbyists gaining undue influence, is a serious concern. The balance between promoting competition and preventing monopolies could be severely disrupted, potentially leading to higher prices and fewer choices for consumers.
His previous comments suggest a disdain for governmental oversight, which could embolden corporate interests and undermine the regulatory framework designed to protect consumers and ensure fair competition. The erosion of consumer protections and the favoring of powerful corporations over individual users presents a substantial threat to a fair and open internet.
The lack of public consultation and the late-night announcement highlight a pattern of undermining democratic processes. This, combined with Carr’s openly partisan rhetoric and actions, casts doubt on his commitment to unbiased regulation and raises fears about the future of internet access in the United States. The secrecy surrounding the decision only adds to the public’s distrust.
Ultimately, Brendan Carr’s appointment to the FCC chief position represents a significant threat to net neutrality. His past actions, statements, and affiliations all point towards a future where the internet becomes more corporatized, less accessible, and less free. The implications are far-reaching and suggest a concerning trend towards deregulation and prioritization of specific corporate interests over the needs of the public.