By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite publicly disavowing it, President-elect Trump’s re-election has emboldened his allies to openly embrace the extreme policy blueprint known as Project 2025. This document, authored by former Trump administration officials and published by the Heritage Foundation, outlines an authoritarian agenda that seeks to dismantle the federal government, replace career civil servants with Trump loyalists, and implement extreme policies on immigration, abortion, energy, and education. While some dismiss this celebration as online trolling, many of these figures are likely to hold positions of influence in the Trump administration, making Project 2025 a real threat to democratic norms and institutions.
Read the original article here
Trump allies are feeling emboldened to openly discuss Project 2025, a conservative agenda that aims to reshape the United States along radical lines. For months, they have been quiet about the project, fearing that it would alienate voters. However, the recent shift in confidence may be due to a belief that the public is now more receptive to their ideas or that they are no longer concerned about the political fallout.
This newfound boldness is evident in the comments of Russell Vought, a key figure behind Project 2025 and a former director of the Office of Management and Budget under Trump. Vought has been outspoken about his plans for the future, even going so far as to say that he has drafted hundreds of executive orders for Trump’s consideration. These plans include the “largest deportation in history,” the use of the military against US citizens to suppress protests, and the dismantling of independent government agencies like the Department of Justice and the FBI.
The reemergence of Project 2025 has sparked concern and outrage amongst those who believe it represents a threat to American democracy. Critics point to its authoritarian elements, its disregard for individual rights, and its potential to further divide the nation. They argue that the plan’s true intentions were masked during the election campaign, and that Trump’s allies are now emboldened to push forward with it because they know they can get away with it.
However, the true impact of Project 2025 remains unclear. Some commentators believe that the plan is nothing more than a political fantasy, a set of ideas that are too extreme to ever be implemented. Others argue that it is a serious threat to American democracy, a blueprint for an authoritarian regime.
The truth likely lies somewhere in between. Project 2025 may not be an immediate threat to the country, but it does represent a dangerous trend in American politics. It shows that there are powerful forces within the Republican party that are willing to use any means necessary to achieve their goals, regardless of the consequences.
The current situation is reminiscent of a political game of cat and mouse, where Trump allies are subtly testing the boundaries of acceptable political discourse. The success of their strategy relies on the public’s willingness to be complacent and to accept their radical agenda. It remains to be seen whether their gamble will pay off, or whether the public will resist their efforts to reshape the nation in their image.