By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Taiwan has reportedly banned TSMC from producing its advanced 2nm chips outside of the country, citing concerns about protecting its core technologies. This decision, made by the Taiwanese government, comes amidst growing tensions with the United States, particularly regarding TSMC’s expansion into Arizona. While TSMC has benefited from US incentives like the CHIPS Act, the Taiwanese government is concerned about potential technology transfer and believes it’s essential to maintain its technological edge in the global semiconductor market. While TSMC may eventually produce 2nm chips abroad, its core technology will remain in Taiwan.
Read the original article here
Taiwan’s recent decision to restrict the manufacturing of 2nm chips outside its borders has sparked debate about the future of TSMC’s ambitions in the United States. The decision, effectively a “forbidden” status for the most advanced chip production, has been met with a mix of understanding, concern, and even some resentment.
Taiwan’s rationale for this move is clear: it’s a strategic play, a bid to safeguard its national security in the face of Chinese aggression. The island nation’s semiconductor industry, with TSMC at its heart, represents its most valuable asset, a “golden goose” that it won’t readily relinquish. The economic and strategic leverage that Taiwan possesses through this advanced technology serves as a vital deterrent, keeping the world invested in its security.
The situation, however, is complex and has historical roots. The US’s wavering commitment to Taiwan’s defense, characterized by a policy of “strategic ambiguity” over the years, has understandably fostered mistrust. Taiwan, having witnessed the consequences of US foreign policy inconsistencies in other regions, is hesitant to rely solely on US promises. The situation with Ukraine, where the US’s commitment ultimately fell short of expectations, serves as a stark reminder of the potential for betrayal.
While the US has been eager to bring advanced chip production to its shores, the Taiwanese government’s decision throws a wrench in these plans. The “forbidden” status of the 2nm node, a clear message to the US, underscores that Taiwan isn’t willing to be a mere supplier of crucial technology, particularly at a time when its own security is at stake.
The move is viewed by many as a calculated maneuver to ensure that Taiwan retains a powerful bargaining chip. By keeping its most advanced technology within its borders, it maintains a significant leverage point in any future negotiations with the US, especially concerning its defense and the potential for Chinese aggression.
The US, for its part, has found itself in a tricky predicament. The reliance on TSMC for advanced semiconductors, a cornerstone of its own technology sector, has created a dangerous dependence. The US’s ability to build its own domestic semiconductor capability, while a strategic goal, is a long-term process that may not materialize quickly enough to satisfy immediate needs.
The situation highlights the complexities of global power dynamics, intertwined with economic realities and national security anxieties. The US’s efforts to reshore its chip production, while driven by strategic considerations, have inadvertently created a dynamic where Taiwan feels compelled to protect its own interests. It’s a delicate dance, where each player must navigate the intricate web of alliances, dependencies, and potential threats.
The consequences of this stalemate remain unclear. The US may face a critical shortage of advanced chips, potentially hindering its technological development. Taiwan, meanwhile, could find itself increasingly isolated, its leverage potentially diminishing over time. The future of US-Taiwan relations, already fraught with uncertainties, hinges on finding a solution that addresses both nations’ concerns while maintaining a semblance of stability in the region. The question remains: will the world’s reliance on Taiwan’s technological prowess be enough to guarantee its security, or will it ultimately fall victim to the whims of geopolitical maneuvering?