By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a surprise incursion by Syrian rebels, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, into government-held areas of Aleppo province, fighting has reached the city itself. The rapid rebel advance, attributed to insufficient Iranian-backed forces, marks the largest offensive since a 2020 de-escalation agreement. While Turkey denies supporting the attack, opposition sources suggest otherwise. The conflict has resulted in civilian casualties, prompting international concern and condemnation from the U.N. and Russia.
Read the original article here
Syrian rebels, in a stunning surprise offensive, have reportedly retaken Aleppo from Assad’s forces. The speed and success of this operation are raising eyebrows globally, prompting questions about the involvement of various regional and international players. The lack of widespread media attention to this potentially significant event is also fueling speculation.
The swiftness of the rebel victory suggests a meticulously planned operation, potentially aided by external support. Reports suggest Turkish intelligence played a crucial role, potentially giving a green light to the offensive, though official Turkish statements deny direct involvement and express concern about escalating regional instability. This apparent contradiction highlights the complex web of alliances and rivalries in the region, with Turkey seemingly walking a tightrope between supporting rebel factions and maintaining a delicate balance with other regional powers.
This situation is complicated by the nature of the rebel groups involved. While some media might label them simply as “rebels,” this overlooks the deeply fragmented nature of the Syrian opposition. The primary group involved, HTS (Tahrir al-Sham), is a complex entity. They were a splinter group from Al-Qaeda, designated a terrorist organization by many, including the US. However, they are currently engaged in open conflict with ISIS, even killing a significant ISIS leader last year with Turkish intelligence assistance. This fact highlights the fluid and shifting alliances within the Syrian conflict, with enemies often becoming allies of convenience depending on the circumstances.
The timing of the rebel offensive is striking. Russia, a key ally of Assad, is currently heavily engaged in Ukraine, diverting resources and attention. This provides a crucial window of opportunity for the rebels. The weakening of Iranian and Hezbollah forces, who have previously supported Assad, also contributes to the rebels’ success. This leaves the Syrian regime relatively vulnerable. The current state of affairs raises concerns about who will step in next to support Assad. The possibility of Russia deploying North Korean mercenaries is mentioned, however far-fetched that may currently seem.
The implications of Aleppo’s recapture are far-reaching. The sudden shift in the balance of power in Syria has the potential to destabilize the region further. Turkey’s potential motivations are complex, potentially ranging from weakening Kurdish groups to creating a pretext for further intervention in Syria. It is crucial to bear in mind the numerous other Islamist groups fighting alongside the rebels and the very real potential for them to gain ground.
The situation underscores the broader geopolitical tensions at play. Some commentators are even suggesting we are witnessing a form of World War III, although this is a debatable assessment. While there is no direct major power conflict, the series of interconnected proxy wars, regional conflicts, and power struggles certainly creates an atmosphere of escalating global tension.
The long-term consequences of Aleppo’s recapture remain uncertain. The success of HTS in holding the city and consolidating power is questionable. Despite the initial gains, managing a sustained military campaign and governing a major city presents significant challenges. The possibility of a renewed ISIS presence is a looming concern, and its potential takeover would have drastic consequences for both the regional and international situation.
The question of whether this is ultimately beneficial for the people of Aleppo is paramount. The ongoing conflict has inflicted immense suffering, and the return to conflict creates a fresh wave of uncertainty and hardship. Regardless of who holds power, the population needs peace, stability, and humanitarian assistance. The US’s role in Syria is also a relevant factor. While the US has focused on other priorities, its past support for some rebel factions makes the current development deeply complex, prompting more questions than answers.
Ultimately, the Aleppo situation is a stark reminder of the multifaceted and volatile nature of the Syrian conflict. The complex interplay of various actors, the shifting alliances, and the uncertainty regarding the long-term consequences highlight the need for nuanced understanding and careful analysis. The ongoing conflict in Syria serves as a microcosm of the larger global geopolitical struggles and emphasizes the importance of sustained diplomatic efforts and international cooperation to achieve lasting peace and stability in the region.