By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite initial appearances of victory, the Assad regime in Syria faces a renewed and significant threat. A recent, swift offensive by the opposition, fueled by the weakened state of Assad’s allies (Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah), has led to the collapse of government forces in northern Syria and advances toward Hama. This offensive exploits the stretched resources of Assad’s key supporters, who are preoccupied with conflicts elsewhere. The Assad dynasty’s long reign, marked by corruption and mismanagement, highlights the eventual fragility of even the most entrenched regimes.
Read the original article here
The illusion of Assad’s grip on Syria shatters, as Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah let their guard down. A stunning offensive launched by Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the rebranded successor to al-Qaeda’s Jabhat al-Nusra, originating from Idlib province, has rapidly reshaped the Syrian conflict’s landscape. In a mere 72 hours, HTS forces surged towards the heart of Aleppo, triggering a cascade of events that has left many questioning the long-term viability of the Assad regime.
The speed and success of this offensive speak volumes about the weakened state of Assad’s supporters. Russia, preoccupied with the ongoing war in Ukraine, appears to have significantly reduced its military commitment to Syria. This diminished support, coupled with Iran’s and Hezbollah’s own preoccupation with escalating tensions with Israel, has created a strategic vacuum that HTS exploited with devastating efficiency. Reports of collapsing government forces and rebel advances toward Hama paint a picture of a regime on the brink. The situation rapidly escalated beyond the initial reports, catching many observers completely off guard.
The timing of the HTS offensive is also highly significant. Just days prior, there were indications that Assad was planning a major offensive to finally subdue HTS in Idlib. The sudden reversal, with the Syrian army seemingly abandoning territory with minimal resistance, points to a severe leadership failure or a complete breakdown in the chain of command. The claim that the retreat was a tactical maneuver to prepare for a large-scale counter-offensive feels unconvincing given the scale of the initial collapse. This suggests a deeper systemic weakness within the Syrian army, possibly due to low morale, lack of resources, or simply a lack of meaningful support from their key allies.
The consequences of this upheaval are far-reaching. The potential fall of Assad, a key ally of Russia and Iran, could represent a significant loss for both powers. Russia risks losing its strategically important Mediterranean naval base, a crucial asset in its geopolitical strategy. For Iran, the loss of a major regional partner would severely undermine its influence in the Middle East. Furthermore, the success of HTS, despite its problematic history and ideology, raises profound concerns about the future of Syria. The prospect of a region dominated by a group with al-Qaeda ties is a deeply unsettling one, potentially leading to even greater instability and humanitarian crises.
This situation is further complicated by the potential involvement of other actors. Turkey, for example, may be tacitly supporting HTS given the regional shifts. While previously cautious, a changing geopolitical landscape might have lessened Turkey’s concerns about the implications of HTS’s advance. This highlights the intricate web of alliances and competing interests that have defined the Syrian conflict, where the lines between allies and enemies can blur and shift rapidly. This volatile situation also increases the risk of regional escalation, possibly involving Israel.
The speed at which the Syrian conflict is developing mirrors global anxieties surrounding the Ukraine war. Many are drawing parallels between the current situation and the volatile political atmosphere of 1913, just before the outbreak of World War I. The sheer unexpectedness of the HTS advance speaks to a deeper issue: the unpredictable nature of modern conflict, influenced by seemingly unrelated global events. The possibility of large-scale intervention by external actors, including increased Russian involvement, or even direct intervention by Israel to protect its strategic interests, adds an extra layer of complexity and uncertainty.
The outcome of this crisis remains uncertain. While there’s widespread concern about the rise of HTS, the current situation presents an opportunity for a significant shift in the power dynamics of the region. The fall of Assad may open the door to a new chapter in Syria’s history, but whether this chapter will lead to lasting peace and stability or further descent into chaos remains to be seen. The situation is fluid and unpredictable, underscoring the complexity of the Syrian civil war and the potential for unexpected, dramatic shifts in power. The coming weeks and months will undoubtedly bring further developments, each with the potential to dramatically alter the future of Syria.