By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Senator Bernie Sanders has publicly stated his opposition to calls for Justice Sonia Sotomayor to step down from the Supreme Court, despite recent speculation among some Democrats that doing so would allow President Biden to appoint a liberal replacement before the end of his term. Sanders believes that such a move is “not sensible” and has not elaborated further on his stance. This speculation arises from the upcoming transition of power, which will see a Republican president and a likely Republican-controlled Senate, potentially impacting the court’s ideological balance in the future. The debate echoes the situation surrounding Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s refusal to step down during President Obama’s term, which ultimately led to her conservative replacement after her death.
Read the original article here
Sen. Bernie Sanders has stated that he does not support urging Justice Sonia Sotomayor to step down from the Supreme Court. He believes that this would be a strategic mistake, as it would likely lead to a conservative replacement given the current political climate.
Sanders’ argument centers on the fact that Republicans hold a majority in the Senate and would likely block any attempt by President Biden to nominate a replacement for Sotomayor. This would result in the loss of a liberal seat on the court, effectively shifting the balance further to the right. He points out that this is particularly problematic given the recent appointments of conservative justices, which have already solidified a conservative majority on the court.
Sanders emphasizes that the time for such a move was several years ago, when Democrats held a majority in the Senate. He argues that the current situation presents a high risk for Democrats and that there is no viable path forward for a successful nomination given Republican opposition.
Additionally, Sanders expresses concern about the potential consequences for the court’s composition if Sotomayor were to step down. He notes that with the retirements of justices like Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer, a conservative majority would only solidify further, potentially resulting in a 7-2 majority for the next several decades.
Furthermore, Sanders critiques the Democratic party’s reluctance to utilize its power strategically. He believes that they have consistently failed to act decisively when they had the opportunity, often ceding ground to Republicans who have demonstrated a willingness to exploit any advantage they can find.
Sanders’ comments highlight the precarious position of the Democratic party in relation to the Supreme Court. With a conservative majority in place and limited options for replacement, any move that could potentially weaken the court’s liberal wing is viewed with great caution.