By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Kyiv Independent celebrates its third anniversary, a milestone made possible by the generous support of our 12,000 members. While millions read our free, accessible journalism, only a fraction contribute financially. To ensure our continued operation and prepare for the challenges of 2025, we are seeking 1,000 new members. Your contribution, whether a membership or spreading the word, directly supports our mission of independent reporting.
Read the original article here
The General Staff reporting a figure of 717,590 Russian troop losses in Ukraine since February 24th, 2022 is a staggering number. It immediately raises questions about what exactly that figure encompasses. Is it just those killed in action, or does it also include wounded, missing in action, prisoners of war, and those who have deserted? The lack of clarity in the initial report makes it difficult to fully assess the significance of the figure.
This enormous loss of life is undeniably tragic. It represents a profound waste of human potential, a brutal cost paid for what appears to many as a futile and ego-driven war. The question of why so many lives have been sacrificed for the seemingly unattainable goal of restoring Russia to some imagined “Glory Days” remains deeply troubling.
The scale of the losses also begs for comparison with those suffered by other nations in other conflicts. The total US Army casualties in World War II, for example, were approximately 900,000. The Russian losses in Ukraine, already exceeding 700,000 and still rising, dwarf even the staggering losses suffered in the Vietnam War by the United States (around 50,000). These comparisons help emphasize the sheer magnitude of the human cost.
The sheer number of casualties reported raises questions about the reliability of the source and the methods used to gather the data. While some sources suggest the figure includes both killed and wounded personnel, the precise breakdown remains uncertain. It’s crucial to acknowledge potential biases and the difficulties in obtaining accurate information from a conflict zone. Independent assessments and verification are essential.
The discussion regarding tank losses further highlights the extent of Russia’s military setbacks. While initial estimates suggested Russia had substantial tank reserves, the reported losses are so substantial that they’re eating into even those reserves. The sheer number of tanks lost supports the significant casualty figures. This leads to more questions about the sustainability of Russia’s war effort.
Considering the reported troop losses in relation to Russia’s population, one might argue that 717,590 casualties represent a relatively small percentage (0.005%) of the overall population. This however, fails to grasp the severity of the situation. A significant portion of the losses likely comes from the most capable and experienced soldiers, meaning the long-term impact on Russia’s military strength and overall societal well-being will be severe. A generation has been lost.
There’s a natural inclination to focus primarily on Russian losses, but the human cost for Ukraine is equally devastating, though less widely reported. Estimates from various sources, even with the caveats mentioned earlier, suggest substantial Ukrainian losses as well, underscoring the brutal reality of this conflict.
The war in Ukraine has exposed the vulnerability of Russia’s military strategies and capabilities, and the vast number of casualties underscores a potential failure of leadership and planning. The casual disregard for the lives of Russian soldiers raises disturbing questions about the nature of the conflict and the values of those who initiated it.
Whether the final casualty count is exactly 717,590 or somewhat different, the scale of the losses is undeniable. The war’s human cost is monumental and will likely cast a long shadow over both Russia and Ukraine for decades to come. The ongoing conflict compels introspection on the true cost of war and the need for peaceful resolutions to international disputes.