By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Reports indicate that Russia is paying approximately $2,000 per month to as many as 100,000 North Korean troops deployed to aid its war effort in Ukraine. However, analysts believe Kim Jong Un will likely retain the majority of these funds, using them to maintain loyalty among the elite and bolster the regime’s resources. This financial influx could significantly impact North Korea’s economy, despite the dire conditions faced by the soldiers themselves, who are unlikely to receive any substantial compensation. The money may instead be used for military equipment, luxury goods for elites, or improved food supplies to quell potential unrest.
Read the original article here
Russia is reportedly spending millions to pay for the services of up to 100,000 North Korean soldiers. However, the reality for these soldiers is likely far removed from the financial promises made. It’s highly improbable that a significant portion of this money, if any, will actually reach them or their families.
The situation paints a grim picture. It’s essentially human trafficking on a massive scale, where soldiers are essentially being sold to fight a war they have no stake in. The idea of buying 100,000 lives is chilling. The claim that the money’s destination is unknown is frankly absurd; the system is opaque, but the likely destination is painfully obvious.
If any money does trickle down to the soldiers or their families, it will be a pittance, negligible in the face of the risks involved. We’re talking about sums so small that they might as well be nothing at all. This isn’t a question of whether some of the money makes it to the soldiers; it’s about the degree to which they’re being exploited.
Interestingly, the soldiers themselves might view this deployment as an honor, a testament to the effectiveness of North Korean propaganda. The promise of better food and slightly better pay – relatively speaking – could be enough to encourage participation in this dangerous venture. It’s a tragic illustration of how brainwashing can override basic self-preservation instincts.
The reality is that the vast majority of the funds will likely end up lining the pockets of middlemen and, ultimately, the North Korean regime. This is a well-established pattern; Russia’s long history of using North Korean labor demonstrates this pattern clearly. It’s a form of modern-day slavery, cloaked in the guise of a mercenary agreement.
Numerous reports and documentaries highlight this exploitation. The money isn’t intended for the soldiers’ welfare; it’s a means of generating revenue for the Kim Jong Un regime, which has other, more extravagant priorities. Instead of improving the lives of the North Korean population, this money likely funds the regime’s lavish lifestyle. Think less about improved living conditions and more about the acquisition of luxury goods and the strengthening of the regime’s military capabilities.
The soldiers’ fate is even more disheartening. The survival rate is likely very low, rendering any discussion of compensation rather moot. Those who do survive are unlikely to receive any meaningful compensation beyond what is offered as a basic survival package and a gesture from the dictator.
The international community has to grapple with this situation. There are calls for stronger Western intervention and support for Ukraine, recognizing the significance of Russia’s use of North Korean soldiers. This situation underscores the urgent need for coordinated action to prevent such blatant exploitation.
But this isn’t a new phenomenon. North Korea has a history of sending its citizens to work overseas, often under exploitative conditions. These workers toil in various sectors, from construction to manufacturing, with all the profits flowing directly back to the regime. This practice provides North Korea with a much-needed influx of foreign currency, enabling the regime to circumvent international sanctions.
The difference this time is the scale and the nature of the deployment. Instead of manual labor, North Korean soldiers are being used as cannon fodder in a major conflict. The implications are immense, and the consequences are severe. It’s a tragic testament to the brutality of the regime and the desperation it drives its citizens to. The potential for escalation and the humanitarian catastrophe this presents cannot be understated. The international community must seriously consider its response, before the number of soldiers deployed increases further, and the conflict escalates beyond current predictions.