By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, argues in his new book, *Dawn’s Early Light*, that a “controlled burn” is necessary to revitalize America. This “burn” would target institutions like the FBI, Ivy League colleges, and the Boy Scouts, which he sees as corrupted and hindering conservative aims. Roberts uses fire imagery throughout the book, comparing progressive policies to Dutch elm disease and advocating for “burning away the rot” of existing institutions. His rhetoric, reminiscent of Trump’s own fiery language, has already proven controversial, and with Trump’s victory, his call for a “controlled burn” is likely to alarm progressives.
Read the original article here
The book, penned by the head of Project 2025, calls for a metaphorical “burning” of various institutions and organizations, including the FBI, the New York Times, and the Boy Scouts of America. This “burning” is meant to represent a complete dismantling and destruction of these entities, which the author views as detrimental to the country.
The author’s reasoning behind this extreme call to action is rooted in a deep-seated distrust of these institutions, which he sees as corrupt and working against the interests of the people. The FBI, in his view, has become an agency that primarily targets American citizens, rather than foreign threats. He criticizes the New York Times for allegedly publishing biased reporting and failing to adhere to journalistic standards, suggesting that it has become a mouthpiece for a particular political ideology.
The Boy Scouts of America, he argues, are no longer the upstanding organization they once were. This sentiment seems to be fueled by a combination of factors, including the organization’s recent decision to allow girls to participate and a perceived moral decline.
The author’s proposed “burning” of these organizations is a radical solution, bordering on violent rhetoric. This is especially true considering his references to historical events like the Reichstag Fire and the fate of dictators like Ceauşescu and Qaddafi. The author’s views are clearly extreme and align with a fringe ideology that sees these institutions as enemies of the people.
While the author presents his arguments with passion, they lack any concrete evidence to support his claims. His accusations of corruption and manipulation are based on speculation and personal opinions, rather than factual evidence. The author’s call for a “burning” of these institutions is a deeply unsettling one, lacking any realistic or pragmatic solutions to the perceived problems.