By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine’s use of British-supplied Storm Shadow missiles on Russian territory has dramatically escalated the conflict, prompting Russia to retaliate with an intermediate-range ballistic missile strike on Dnipro and threats against Western arms suppliers. This marks a significant shift, as Russia’s covert campaign of sabotage, cyberattacks, and disinformation against Western nations, already underway, now operates under heightened public scrutiny. The recent severing of Baltic Sea fiber optic cables is widely attributed to this ongoing Russian hybrid warfare, highlighting the expanding scope of attacks targeting critical infrastructure and potentially escalating into a wider conflict. This escalating situation necessitates a reevaluation of Western responses to Russian aggression and the potential consequences of a weakened transatlantic alliance.
Read the original article here
Putin’s shadow war against the West, long suspected, is finally becoming undeniable. The numerous acts of sabotage, the severed undersea cables, the destruction of pipelines – these are no longer subtle actions; they represent a blatant escalation. It’s clear that Russia’s actions aren’t limited to the conflict in Ukraine; this is a broader, more insidious campaign targeting Western interests. The sheer volume of incidents makes any attempts to dismiss them as coincidences utterly unconvincing.
The West’s reluctance to explicitly acknowledge this open warfare is baffling, bordering on willful blindness. It’s as if we’re collectively clinging to a fragile hope that if we ignore the elephant in the room, it will magically disappear. But ignoring the reality of the situation doesn’t change the facts on the ground. Putin’s aggression, fueled by a distorted vision of Russian greatness and a nostalgic yearning for the Soviet era, is escalating dramatically. His regime’s disregard for international norms and the sovereignty of other nations is evident in its actions.
The West’s response thus far has been inadequate. Sanctions, while a necessary tool, haven’t deterred Putin’s actions. This underscores the need for a far more robust and coordinated response. The ongoing complacency, even within the highest echelons of power, is alarming. Leaders seem unwilling, or perhaps unable, to grasp the gravity of the situation and to make the difficult decisions necessary to counter Putin’s aggression. This lack of decisive action risks emboldening Putin and escalating the conflict further.
Furthermore, the insidious nature of this war extends beyond physical acts of sabotage. Putin’s mastery of misinformation and psyops campaigns has proven frighteningly effective, sowing discord and undermining trust in Western institutions. The spread of disinformation across social media platforms, the manipulation of elections, and the exploitation of existing divisions within society—these are all tools of this shadow war. The prevalence of Russian-linked actors within various Western institutions, including media and government, further illustrates the depth of Putin’s reach and his ability to infiltrate key decision-making processes.
The West’s response, characterized by inaction and a reluctance to call this war what it is, only encourages further aggression. We are witnessing the consequences of a prolonged appeasement policy, a failure to address the root causes of Putin’s actions, and a surprising lack of awareness of the extent of Russian influence within Western societies. This passive response serves only to empower Putin and embolden his aggressive tactics. The notion that Putin is merely engaged in a defensive posture is demonstrably false; his actions reveal a clear pattern of expansionism and aggression.
The involvement of external actors, such as North Korea, in supplying weapons to Russia represents a dramatic escalation of the conflict. This underscores the need for a united front, a forceful condemnation of Russia’s actions, and a clear articulation of the consequences of further escalation. Any hesitation, any attempt to avoid direct confrontation, will only invite further aggression. The long-term consequences of this inaction are far-reaching and potentially devastating.
The question isn’t whether the West is at war with Russia, but how will the West respond to this unprovoked aggression. A decisive response, rather than continued appeasement, is essential to deter further escalation and to secure the safety and security of Western nations. Failure to address this challenge decisively will only allow Putin to further advance his goals, potentially triggering far-reaching and devastating consequences for global security and stability. The world is dangerously close to a precipice, and the longer we wait, the more perilous the situation becomes. The time for decisive action is now.