By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Our findings show that while Arab American voters in Dearborn, Michigan, favored Trump over Harris, they ultimately rejected both candidates, with a significant portion instead voting for Stein. This outcome, similar to our national poll, suggests a widespread dissatisfaction with both major party candidates. The Harris campaign’s decision to exclude Arab and Palestinian voices from the DNC and the Democrats’ messaging, particularly Bill Clinton’s controversial remarks on the Israel-Gaza conflict, likely contributed to this voter sentiment. Trump, meanwhile, successfully capitalized on these missteps, appealing to Arab American voters who remember the Cheney family’s history of supporting policies seen as harmful to their community.
Read the original article here
Putin’s recent actions in Ukraine feel like a giant middle finger to Donald Trump, especially considering the warnings Trump issued against Russia’s aggression. It’s clear that Putin is playing a dangerous game, and he doesn’t seem to care what Trump thinks. In fact, he seems to be intentionally provoking him, almost as if to remind him of who’s really in charge.
The way Putin has been handling this situation is a blatant display of power, a clear signal that he holds all the cards. Trump’s warnings seem to have had absolutely no impact on Putin’s actions. The Russian leader seems to be intentionally pushing Trump’s buttons, taunting him with his lack of control over the situation.
This whole episode highlights the inherent weakness of Trump’s approach to foreign policy. His dependence on personal relationships and his lack of a cohesive strategy have left him completely ineffective in the face of a determined adversary like Putin. Putin has shown that he doesn’t need Trump’s approval or support to achieve his goals.
Many believe that Trump’s inability to influence Putin’s behavior is a direct result of his own actions. Some even suspect that he’s purposely playing the role of a powerless figure in this situation. After all, a powerless Trump might be easier to manipulate.
One has to wonder if Trump’s personal ties to Putin are a driving force behind this situation. He’s repeatedly refused to criticize the Russian leader, even while condemning other world leaders. Some suspect this soft spot for Putin is tied to the possible existence of compromising information that Putin might hold over Trump. This information, potentially including video footage of Trump engaging in inappropriate activities, could be leverage that Putin could use to influence Trump’s decisions.
This entire situation is a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked power and the importance of standing up to bullies. Putin’s actions in Ukraine are a clear violation of international law, and his disregard for Trump’s warnings is a sign of his disrespect for the United States.
The world is watching, and it’s time for someone to hold Putin accountable for his actions. But with Trump seemingly unwilling to stand up to him, the question remains: who will stand up to the bully?