By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Alexei Zimin, a prominent Russian chef and vocal critic of Moscow’s war in Ukraine, was found dead in Belgrade, Serbia, during a visit to promote his latest book. The circumstances surrounding his death are currently under investigation, but initial reports suggest no foul play. Zimin, who had previously fled Russia following the annexation of Crimea, was known for his anti-war stance and had faced threats and harassment after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. His passing follows a disturbing pattern of deaths among Russian expatriates who have spoken out against the Kremlin, raising concerns about the possibility of Russian government involvement.
Read the original article here
The news of the death of a famed Russian chef and outspoken Putin critic in Belgrade has sparked a wave of speculation and concern. The chef, who owned a restaurant in London, was found dead in a flat he was renting in Belgrade while promoting his latest book. The circumstances surrounding his death have raised eyebrows, particularly given his history of criticizing the Russian government.
While authorities initially stated that the death appeared to be non-suspicious, the fact that the flat was locked from the inside has fueled suspicion. Some believe that the chef may have been targeted for assassination, pointing to the recent history of Russian dissidents and critics meeting untimely ends. The Salisbury poisonings, which saw a former Russian double agent and his daughter poisoned with a nerve agent, have left many convinced that Russia has a long reach and is willing to silence its critics, regardless of location.
The chef’s decision to travel to Serbia, a country with close ties to Russia, has also been met with skepticism. Many wonder why a vocal critic of Putin would choose to visit a country that has been seen as a safe haven for Russians. Some suggest that Serbia’s welcoming visa policy for Russians may have made it a convenient location for a hit. Others argue that the chef may have simply believed himself to be too low-profile to be a target, underestimating the reach and resources of the Russian government.
This tragedy has once again highlighted the dangers faced by those who dare to criticize the Russian government. It also raises questions about the role of the international community in protecting individuals from such threats. The world seems to be holding its breath, waiting to see how this incident will play out.
While some dismiss the possibility of assassination, arguing that the chef’s death was likely due to natural causes, the lingering fear of Russian state-sponsored violence remains. The recent history of assassinations and poisonings, coupled with the chef’s outspoken criticism of the Russian government, makes it difficult to ignore the possibility of foul play.
This event serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which authoritarian regimes will go to silence their critics. It also highlights the vulnerability of even those who believe they are beyond the reach of such forces. The world watches with bated breath, wondering if this will be another tragic example of the dangers of speaking truth to power.