By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte publicly threatened to have President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., his wife, and House Speaker Martin Romualdez killed should she be assassinated. This threat, deemed a national security issue, prompted an immediate increase in the President’s security detail and an investigation into the Vice President’s actions. The threat followed a bitter political falling-out between the two leaders, fueled by accusations of corruption and political persecution. Duterte’s statement, made during a news conference, allegedly involved pre-arranged plans for retribution, potentially constituting a criminal offense under Philippine law.
Read the original article here
The Philippine vice president’s public declaration that she’d hired an assassin to kill the president, his wife, and the House speaker if she were killed, sent shockwaves through the nation. This wasn’t a casual remark; she explicitly stated it was not a joke, escalating the already tense political climate to a dangerous new level.
The gravity of the threat prompted immediate action. The executive secretary flagged it as an “active threat,” referring the matter to the Presidential Security Command for immediate response. The president’s security detail was immediately beefed up, acknowledging the vice president’s brazen threat as a significant national security concern. Law enforcement agencies were also brought into the coordination to prevent any potential harm to the president and his family.
The underlying cause of this explosive outburst stems from a deep and bitter rift between the vice president and the president. Initially running mates in the 2022 elections, their campaign of national unity quickly dissolved. Significant disagreements, particularly regarding China’s assertive actions in the contested South China Sea, fueled their fractured relationship.
This deterioration culminated in the vice president’s resignation from the president’s cabinet. The open hostility grew further as the vice president, mirroring her father’s outspoken nature, launched scathing public criticisms against the president, his wife, and the House speaker, accusing them of corruption, incompetence, and political persecution.
The final trigger for this dramatic threat appears to be the detention of the vice president’s chief of staff. Accused of obstructing a congressional inquiry into the possible misuse of funds, the chief of staff’s detention, and subsequent hospitalization, ignited the vice president’s fury. This led to her pre-dawn online press conference, a tirade filled with expletives and accusations leveled against the president and his allies.
During this press conference, when questioned about her personal security, the vice president revealed her alleged arrangement with an assassin. She claimed to have given explicit instructions: if she were killed, the assassin was to eliminate the president, his wife, and the House speaker. The chilling nonchalance with which she delivered this statement further amplified the severity of the situation.
The legal implications of such a public statement are significant. Under the Philippine penal code, threatening to harm a person or their family is a crime, punishable by imprisonment and fines. However, the immediate focus remains on the security concerns raised by the vice president’s openly stated intentions.
Amidst this political turmoil, the military chief issued a statement emphasizing the Armed Forces’ commitment to nonpartisanship and upholding democratic institutions. A call for calm and unity underscores the nation’s desire to maintain order despite the extraordinary circumstances.
The situation is further complicated by the familial connections and histories involved. The vice president is the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, whose controversial anti-drug campaign is under investigation by the International Criminal Court. This backdrop adds a layer of complexity, given the former president’s own history of controversial statements and actions. The president, meanwhile, is the son of a former dictator, adding another layer of historical context to the current political feud.
The conflicting narratives, the personal animosities, and the potential for escalation all point to a profoundly unstable political environment. The incident raises questions about accountability, the rule of law, and the very stability of the Philippine government. The seemingly casual threat of assassination serves as a stark reminder of the volatile political landscape and the potential for extreme consequences. The international community is watching closely, waiting to see how this dangerous situation will unfold and what steps, if any, will be taken to address the vice president’s explicit threat. The future remains uncertain, burdened by the weight of this unprecedented and alarming event.