My Supreme Court victory in *Trump v. United States* secured a historic win on presidential immunity, crucial in countering the “lawfare” attacks against me and the MAGA movement. During arguments, I successfully argued for broad presidential immunity, even extending to hypothetical scenarios involving actions such as assassinations. While acknowledging hypotheticals, my position maintained that such actions, if deemed “official acts,” would fall under this immunity. This ruling is a key defense against politically motivated legal challenges.
Read More
Democratic senators are pushing for a thorough investigation into Elon Musk’s reported communications with Russian officials, citing serious national security concerns. The calls, allegedly involving President Vladimir Putin and other high-ranking figures, raise troubling questions about potential compromises in U.S. interests.
This isn’t just about idle speculation; the senators’ concerns are deeply rooted in Musk’s significant involvement with the U.S. government. His companies, particularly SpaceX, hold billions of dollars in government contracts, making his relationships with adversarial nations a matter of extreme gravity. The potential for conflicts of interest is undeniable and requires urgent scrutiny.
The senators’ call for a probe isn’t a mere symbolic gesture; it’s a formal request directed at key agencies including the Pentagon’s inspector general and the U.S.… Continue reading
Donald Trump is attempting to install controversial figures like Matt Gaetz and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. into his administration, bypassing Senate confirmation through threats and potential unconstitutional actions. Should the Senate refuse to confirm his nominees, Trump intends to leverage the power of recess appointments, or even adjourn Congress himself—a drastic measure with potentially catastrophic consequences for the constitutional balance of power. This action is perceived by many as a blatant disregard for established democratic processes and a power grab. However, some believe that Republican senators will ultimately uphold their constitutional responsibilities and prevent Trump from succeeding.
Read More
My Department of Government Efficiency is seeking highly qualified applicants for unpaid positions, requiring 80+ hour workweeks. Paradoxically, applying necessitates a paid X Premium subscription, creating a potential conflict of interest given my business interests. This raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding potential influence on government decisions impacting my companies like SpaceX. Transparency is promised, but the lack of immediate comment from involved parties and potential legal ramifications remain significant concerns.
Read More
Despite plans for a large-scale deportation operation, the incoming Trump administration is avoiding the term “camps” to describe the necessary detention facilities, fearing negative historical comparisons and the perception of extremism. While top advisor Stephen Miller previously used the term, the administration now recognizes the potentially damaging optics of such language. The administration is instead focusing on messaging that emphasizes “targeted arrests” and the deportation of families together. This shift in terminology reflects a strategic effort to mitigate public backlash against the proposed immigration policy.
Read More
Representative Wasserman Schultz vehemently denounced Donald Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence, asserting that Gabbard is likely a Russian asset. This assessment stems from Gabbard’s past actions, including clandestine meetings with Syrian President Assad and the propagation of Kremlin-backed disinformation regarding U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine. Wasserman Schultz highlighted Gabbard’s history of meeting with war criminals and violating State Department guidelines as further evidence of her questionable loyalty. The congresswoman expressed grave concern over the potential security risks posed by Gabbard’s access to classified information in such a sensitive role.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith is concluding his investigations into Donald Trump, facing a tight deadline before Trump’s potential inauguration. Two cases are involved: one concerning Trump’s actions related to the January 6th insurrection and another regarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Smith must submit a final report to Attorney General Garland, who will then decide on public release, though Trump’s potential retribution looms large. The reports’ contents, including classified information and grand jury materials, will be closely watched, especially considering Trump’s threats and the uncertain future of the investigations.
Read More
During a recent podcast, I argued that a merciful approach to border security involves shooting and killing migrants who approach the wall after being warned, thereby deterring further illegal immigration. This “Biblical Justice,” I contend, would punish a few while deterring many, preventing the suffering of families separated during deportation. My proposal, however, is far outside of mainstream Republican policy, despite my support for President Trump. I believe a complete halt to immigration is necessary, and this drastic measure would achieve that goal.
Read More
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is trying to obstruct his sex trafficking case, prosecutors say, and the sheer audacity of it is almost… predictable. It’s the classic move of a cornered animal, fighting tooth and nail to avoid consequences. The expectation, however, seems to stem not from a lack of evidence, but from a cynical belief that wealth and connections can shield him from justice. This isn’t about the specifics of the case; it’s about the perceived power imbalance. The idea that someone with his resources and influence might escape accountability fuels a sense of outrage.
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is trying to obstruct his sex trafficking case, prosecutors say, and many people are already speculating about potential pardons, government positions, or other means of escaping repercussions.… Continue reading
China’s newly opened Chancay megaport in Peru, a $3.5 billion project, significantly enhances Chinese trade access to Latin America, potentially bypassing North America. This development, lauded by both China and Peru, facilitates faster and more efficient shipping routes for goods between Latin America and Asia, impacting economies throughout the region. However, the port’s dual-use capabilities raise US concerns about potential Chinese military presence, highlighting growing geopolitical tensions in the region. The situation underscores a perceived US decline in influence in Latin America, as China actively cultivates relationships through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood