By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A blurry image circulating on a Russian Telegram channel shows what appears to be a North Korean 170mm Koksan self-propelled gun traversing central Russia. This raises serious concerns that Pyongyang is supplying Moscow with this significant long-range artillery piece. The weapon’s presence suggests potential support for Russian troop deployments in Ukraine. Further investigation is needed to confirm the authenticity of the image and the extent of North Korean military aid.
Read the original article here
The appearance of North Korean artillery in Russia, reportedly destined for use in Ukraine, is undeniably a significant development. The sheer audacity of this move, a blatant violation of numerous UN sanctions, is striking. It speaks volumes about the desperation of the Russian military, revealing a dependence on outdated weaponry from a country with a questionable track record of producing reliable military equipment.
This isn’t just any artillery; it’s described as “monstrous,” possibly a derivative of a German 17cm cannon studied by the Soviets post-WWII. The scale of the weapons, likely 170mm cannons, suggests an intention to provide Russia with a substantial increase in long-range bombardment and siege capabilities. However, the logistical challenges of transporting and supplying ammunition for a caliber not currently used by the Russian military are significant, presenting an additional burden on a military already struggling with logistics.
The reliability of these North Korean weapons is also a major concern. Many have expressed skepticism about their effectiveness, suggesting they may be inferior to existing Russian artillery. Reports of poor quality and accuracy, coupled with the age of the technology (potentially dating back to the 1960s), raise questions about their actual battlefield impact. The notion of deploying such antique cannons feels surreal; images of them evoke a sense of outdated technology juxtaposed with the modern realities of a major conflict.
Despite the apparent inadequacy of the weaponry, the situation is alarming. The fact that Russia is resorting to acquiring artillery from North Korea showcases the extent of its military shortages and demonstrates its declining capacity for self-sufficiency in armament production. The use of these weapons in Ukraine would represent a significant escalation, potentially increasing the scale and intensity of the conflict.
The global response, or rather the lack thereof, is concerning. Many commentators express frustration at the seeming inaction of international bodies, particularly the UN, and the perceived hesitancy of European powers to become more actively involved. The argument is that this situation represents a further erosion of international norms and a demonstration of growing weakness in the face of aggression.
This situation also presents significant strategic implications. While it might weaken North Korea’s ability to threaten South Korea in the short term by diverting resources, it could also serve to embolden North Korea and further destabilize the region. This move by Russia further underscores the severity of the situation in Ukraine and the far-reaching consequences of the conflict.
Furthermore, the deployment of this artillery provides new targets for Ukrainian forces. The large size of these weapons makes them relatively easy targets for precision strikes, offering potentially significant opportunities for the Ukrainians to degrade Russian capabilities. The potential for counter-battery fire is substantial, offering a chance to neutralize these new threats.
From a geopolitical perspective, the involvement of North Korea adds a new layer of complexity to the conflict. The prospect of North Korean troops and equipment on European soil, along with the potential for more direct engagement, raises concerns about the broader implications of the war and the potential for further escalation. The global community must carefully consider the ramifications of this development and work toward a resolution that prevents further escalation and upholds international norms.
In conclusion, the appearance of “monstrous” North Korean artillery in Russia, potentially destined for use in Ukraine, is a concerning development with significant military, logistical, and geopolitical implications. The situation highlights the desperation of Russia, the potential unreliability of the weapons, and the continued inaction of the international community. The entire event underscores the unpredictable and evolving nature of the conflict in Ukraine.