By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Analysis from G20 nations suggests North Korea may send up to 100,000 troops to support Russia’s war effort in Ukraine, although this deployment wouldn’t be immediate and would likely occur in stages. A source close to the Russian defense ministry indicated this troop influx is a mechanism to replace battlefield losses. This potential deployment, along with reported artillery and weapons shipments, has alarmed Kyiv’s allies and raises concerns about global implications and the deepening partnership between Putin and Kim Jong Un. The escalating situation is expected to be discussed at upcoming international summits.
Read the original article here
North Korea may end up sending 100,000 troops to fight in the war in Ukraine, a move driven by a combination of internal pressures and potential external incentives. The possibility arises from North Korea’s reported food shortages and internal instability, potentially leading to a coup. Sending a substantial portion of its military to fight in Ukraine could offer a solution to this crisis by reducing the population needing to be fed domestically. The sheer scale of this potential deployment – 100,000 troops – is staggering, highlighting the desperate situation in North Korea and the potential strategic calculations at play.
This drastic measure suggests a significant shift in North Korea’s foreign policy, aligning itself more closely with Russia in a mutually beneficial, albeit horrific, arrangement. While not necessarily imminent, such a deployment, as some speculate, could happen in stages, with troops rotating in and out. The reality is far more grim: the likelihood of these soldiers returning home is extremely low, making them expendable in a brutal war. Their participation could drastically alter the dynamics of the conflict, providing Russia with much-needed manpower, even if that manpower is of questionable quality and training.
The implications extend far beyond the immediate battlefield. The potential transfer of advanced Russian submarine technology to North Korea is a particularly alarming prospect, drastically increasing the latter’s ability to strike the U.S. West Coast with nuclear missiles. This underscores the high stakes involved and the potential for unforeseen and catastrophic consequences. The situation calls into question the inaction of the international community, particularly given the precedent of past Russian aggressions in Crimea, Georgia, and Chechnya that went largely unpunished.
The deployment of 100,000 troops would represent a massive escalation of the war, potentially triggering further international involvement. This would test the resolve of both the U.S. and NATO, potentially leading to direct military confrontation or more extensive sanctions against Russia and North Korea. The already dire humanitarian crisis in Ukraine would worsen with the addition of so many more casualties.
The economic aspects of this potential deployment also warrant attention. While North Korea might reduce its food burden, the financial cost of equipping and supplying 100,000 troops is substantial. The money paid to North Korea for these soldiers’ participation could be a crucial incentive, offsetting the considerable expenses of maintaining a large army in the long term. This highlights a cynical calculation where human lives are reduced to mere numbers, a cold, hard cost-benefit analysis based on sheer survival.
Moreover, the potential psychological impact of such a large deployment on North Korea’s own population cannot be ignored. The prospect of losing so many soldiers in a distant war could undermine the regime’s authority, potentially fueling further unrest. The complete lack of concern for the well-being and lives of its soldiers is a chilling testament to the authoritarian nature of the North Korean regime. This also reflects Putin’s desperation for reinforcements, exposing the weakness in his own military capabilities and his willingness to sacrifice lives, even those of his allies, for territorial gains.
It’s worth considering that the rumored 300,000 troops mentioned previously might be an exaggeration or might represent a phased deployment plan. Nevertheless, even 100,000 represents a significant force that could significantly prolong the conflict and increase the death toll. While some suggest that Ukraine could quickly eliminate these troops, the sheer number would put a strain on resources and prolong the conflict. Ultimately, the deployment of such a large force underscores the global security implications of the Ukraine war and the potentially destabilizing effects of alliances between rogue nations. The situation calls for increased vigilance, strategic planning, and perhaps, a reevaluation of international responses to aggression. The risk of wider conflict and global instability is palpable. The “meat grinder” image aptly reflects the human cost of this potential scenario, a cost borne disproportionately by the expendable soldiers of North Korea.