By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Russia launched an experimental hypersonic missile, the Oreshnik, striking a military facility in Dnipro, prompting emergency talks between NATO and Ukraine. Putin framed the attack as retaliation for Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied long-range missiles, claiming the Oreshnik, capable of carrying nuclear or conventional warheads, is unmatched globally and will continue to be tested. This escalation, described by Polish Prime Minister Tusk as a decisive phase of the war, has led to heightened security measures in Kyiv and sparked concerns amongst Western leaders about further Russian actions. The attack, while resulting in no reported fatalities in Dnipro, underscores the intensifying conflict and Russia’s demonstrable technological advancements in weaponry.
Read the original article here
NATO and Ukraine are set to hold emergency talks following Russia’s use of a new hypersonic missile in an attack on a central Ukrainian city. This action marks a significant escalation in the nearly three-year-long conflict, pushing it into what Poland’s Prime Minister has described as a decisive and dramatically intense phase. The attack, targeting a military facility in Dnipro, prompted Ukraine’s parliament to cancel its session amid heightened security concerns.
The Russian attack, utilizing the intermediate-range Oreshnik missile, was explicitly framed by President Putin as retaliation for Ukraine’s use of longer-range missiles supplied by the US and UK, capable of striking deeper into Russian territory. Putin, in a nationally televised address, boasted that the Oreshnik, traveling at Mach 11 and carrying multiple warheads, is unmatched in the world, highlighting its potential for devastating damage even when equipped with conventional, rather than nuclear, warheads. He emphasized Russia’s ongoing production and testing of the missile, including its use in combat situations depending on the evolving threat landscape.
This brazen display of military might has understandably raised alarm bells within NATO and Ukraine. Putin’s claim that Western air defenses are powerless against this new weapon is a clear attempt to intimidate and dissuade further Western support for Ukraine. General Sergei Karakayev, head of Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces, further amplified this threat, asserting that the Oreshnik’s range encompasses much of Europe and that its conventional warheads, when deployed in sufficient numbers, could replicate the impact of a nuclear strike.
The Kremlin’s rhetoric has remained fiercely aggressive, blaming the West’s supply of weapons to Ukraine for provoking this escalation. The Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, issued a veiled threat of further retaliatory actions should Western concerns not be addressed. This aggressive stance has been echoed by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who, while suggesting US involvement in guiding the Ukrainian missile strikes, also warned against underestimating Russia’s capacity for response and dismissed the recent adjustments to Russia’s nuclear deployment doctrine as anything less than a serious threat.
The international community is grappling with the implications of this development. Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavský has labeled the attack an escalatory step intended to intimidate both Ukraine and Europe. He affirmed the Czech Republic’s unwavering support for providing Ukraine with the necessary air defense systems and vowed that there will be no limitations on the weapons and equipment given to Ukraine. This sentiment underlines the growing international concern over Russia’s actions.
The attack itself caused damage to the Pivdenmash plant in Dnipro, a significant military facility with historical links to the Soviet Union’s ICBM program. Despite the absence of reported fatalities, the incident has heightened anxieties throughout Ukraine. Further complicating the situation, Russia launched an overnight drone strike on a residential district of Sumy, resulting in casualties. This underscores the continued breadth and intensity of Russia’s military actions across Ukraine.
The emergency talks between NATO and Ukraine are pivotal. They are needed to assess the implications of Russia’s hypersonic missile deployment and to coordinate a response to this concerning escalation. The discussions will likely center around bolstering Ukraine’s defenses against such advanced weapons, exploring potential countermeasures, and potentially evaluating further sanctions or other diplomatic measures to deter Russia from further aggression. The urgency of the situation underscores the need for decisive and unified action from the international community.
The situation remains tense and volatile. The potential for further escalation remains high, demanding a unified and resolute response from the West. While diplomatic efforts are essential, it is equally crucial to prepare for all contingencies, ensuring the necessary military and humanitarian aid is readily available to support Ukraine and deter any further aggressive actions by Russia. The world watches with bated breath as this crisis unfolds.