By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s “DOGE Plan” proposes drastic federal government restructuring, advocating for significant staff reductions based on a flawed premise of an overly large and inefficient bureaucracy. Their plan, lacking concrete details and expertise, hinges on an undefined “lean team” and the deployment of “advanced technology,” despite the significant existing reliance on government contractors. The authors’ conflicts of interest, notably Musk’s dealings with the federal government and Trump’s potential protection of the oil and gas industry, undermine their claims of disinterested reform. Ultimately, the plan’s reliance on unsubstantiated assertions and lack of practical implementation strategies render it unrealistic and potentially harmful.
Read the original article here
Musk and Ramaswamy: The Smartest Most Clueless Guys in the Room – Is DOGE just short for greedy libertarian billionaire dipshits?
Musk’s supposed intelligence is a carefully constructed illusion, a distraction from the real machinations unfolding. The portrayal of him in *Iron Man 2* is not far off the mark; he’s a figurehead, a useful idiot in a much larger game, while simultaneously deeply offensive and greedy. His success wasn’t earned through innovation or hard work, but through nepotism and a shrewd ability to manipulate the system, ultimately convincing the government to fund his ventures. He’s the epitome of a spoiled brat, operating with a blatant disregard for ethical considerations.
Ramaswamy, similarly, is an opportunist, reminiscent of Trump in his ruthless pursuit of power, devoid of any genuine moral compass. Both men embody a type of leadership that prioritizes personal gain above all else, and their presence in positions of influence represents a significant threat to the public good. The thought of these two individuals wielding any real governmental power is deeply unsettling. It feels as if the ultra-wealthy are plotting to siphon vast sums of taxpayer money into their own coffers, using “cost-cutting” as a smokescreen for their greed. The idea of Americans suffering hardship to benefit billionaires is not merely a conspiracy theory; it’s a stark reality that’s being played out before our eyes.
The supposed libertarianism of these individuals is a farce. They aren’t driven by any genuine ideological principles; their actions are guided solely by a desire for unchecked power and freedom from accountability. Their pursuit of less government isn’t rooted in a commitment to individual liberty, but rather serves as a tool to dismantle regulations and safeguards that impede their accumulation of wealth. Their methods are inherently authoritarian, despite their public pronouncements.
Dogecoin, in this context, becomes something far more sinister than a cryptocurrency. It’s a vehicle for enriching loyalists and securing government contracts. The entire charade feels like a massive grift playing out in real time, a cynical manipulation of the public trust. The notion that billionaires have our best interests at heart is absurd; their actions consistently demonstrate a profound lack of concern for the well-being of ordinary citizens.
The idealized libertarian vision, reliant on a rational and well-educated population functioning within a perfectly efficient market, is pure fantasy. It’s a utopian dream as unrealistic as communism, both systems falling apart when subjected to real-world conditions. The true nature of Musk and Ramaswamy isn’t about ideological purity; it’s about power, control, and the consolidation of wealth at the top.
The term “GLBD” – Greedy Libertarian Billionaire Dipshits – accurately captures the essence of these individuals. It highlights not only their greed but also their lack of intellectual honesty and their appalling disregard for democratic principles. Musk, in particular, is a prime example of someone who has bought his way to success, lacking the genuine talent or expertise often associated with his achievements. He represents the worst kind of success—one purchased through manipulation, privilege, and a complete absence of accountability.
The supposed “efficiency” these men promise is merely a pretext for targeting those who challenge their authority and those who belong to demographics they disdain. This “cost-cutting” is not about improving government; it is about consolidating power and silencing dissent. The idea that their bank accounts are a measure of their intellect is laughable; their wealth simply demonstrates their willingness to exploit and endanger others for personal gain. Ultimately, their entire enterprise is a cynical cash grab, a meticulously planned scheme to maximize profits at the expense of the public. The repeated accusations of grifting and exploitation are not mere hyperbole; they represent the truth of their actions. And it’s a truth that must be recognized and resisted.