By John Q. Hosedrinker 
US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has responded to remarks made by billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban, who suggested Donald Trump did not associate with “strong, intelligent women”. Greene responded by posting a video of herself working out on social media and stated that she is one of the strong and intelligent women supporting Trump. She also made personal jabs at Cuban, who she claimed was intimidated by “strong, intelligent women”, and advised him to go to the gym.
Read the original article here
MTG doing pull-ups to prove Trump hangs out with ‘strong, intelligent women’ is a perplexing spectacle that perfectly encapsulates the ongoing absurdity in American politics. The notion that physical strength equates to being a strong woman not only misses the mark but also reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what strength truly entails. It’s almost comical how she seems to think that merely getting her chin above a bar qualifies her as a beacon of empowerment. It’s akin to someone playing a piano poorly and claiming to be a concert pianist. Strength, especially for women, is about resilience, intellect, emotional stability, and the ability to handle adversity, rather than the number of pull-ups one can perform.
Observing MTG perform her pull-ups feels more like a desperate attempt for validation than an authentic display of strength. If this is her way of proving her worth or aligning herself with Trump’s ideals of ‘strong’ women, it’s glaringly misguided. An intelligent woman would see right through the facade inherent in such a display—recognizing that true strength lies in self-reliance and independence, rather than a mere physical feat. It’s fascinating to think about how one dimensional her definition of strength is, reducing it to something as superficial as the ability to lift one’s body weight. The irony is palpable when you consider that many individuals who embody true strength wouldn’t even think of physical prowess as their defining characteristic.
MTG’s determination to show off her ‘strength’ simultaneously highlights her limitations. The disconnect is staggering; while she grapples with the idea of what it means to be strong and intelligent, the reality is that intelligence extends beyond the ability to do pull-ups. It’s about critical thinking, empathy, and the capacity to engage with others constructively. Strong women can lift others up metaphorically (and literally) by using their platforms for meaningful discourse and promoting positivity in the face of adversity. Instead, MTG has taken a route that feels more akin to a circus act than a sincere outreach to empower women.
Each failed pull-up speaks volumes about how off-base her interpretation of what constitutes a ‘strong’ woman is. It’s not just a missed rep; it’s a missed opportunity to redefine what it truly means to embody strength in today’s world. The comments surrounding her performance are equally revealing; they underscore a general sentiment that the bar has been set low, not just for her, but for those who seek validation through physical endeavors to define their worth. If being a strong woman is measured by the number of pull-ups one can do, then the entire narrative surrounding women’s empowerment has devolved into a grotesque parody of itself.
Criticism towards her pulls no punches, and it’s easy to see why. Embracing the notion that one’s worth can be measured by such simplistic metrics is a disservice to women everywhere, particularly when so many exemplify true strength through their actions and intellect. It raises the question of how would MTG respond to women who actually embody strength in their communities? Would she dismiss their contributions because they don’t follow her interpretation of ‘strong’? The irony is thick here; a supposed advocate for maternal values and strong women is instead reinforcing outdated stereotypes with each pull-up attempt.
The juxtaposition between MTG’s physical bravado and her evident lack of intellectual prowess is amusing yet unsettling. It paints a picture of someone desperately trying to fit square pegs into round holes, missing the larger narrative—the historical and cultural complexities associated with being a strong, intelligent woman. If only she could take a moment to consider that a woman’s strength is often found in her ability to navigate life with dignity and intellect, rather than in the pressure of a bar. It is a stark reality that the realm of strength, especially in the context she presents, runs far deeper than what can be achieved in a gym.
Ultimately, the physical representation seems to drown out the critical discussions about the powerful women in our society and what true strength embodies. It feels like a distraction, a shallow chase for applause in an arena where substance should reign supreme. Strong women do exist, and they are not measured simply by their physical capabilities. They are thinkers, leaders, advocates, and warriors in their own right. Therefore, MTG’s misguided attempt should be viewed less as a highlight and more as an invitation to rethink how we define strength—an opportunity to move beyond superficial stereotypes and embrace the multifaceted women leading the charge for progress today.