By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the 2024 election, some prominent female Trump supporters are expressing disillusionment with the movement’s exclusionary culture. This shift is evidenced by commentary from influencers like Jessica Reed Kraus, who noted the overwhelmingly male-dominated atmosphere surrounding recent Trump events, highlighting the lack of female input and consideration. Similar sentiments are echoed by other female supporters online, revealing a growing awareness of the inherent sexism within the MAGA movement and its consequences. This disillusionment is further highlighted by the viral hashtag #FAFO, showcasing instances of regret among Trump voters facing repercussions for their political choices. The article concludes by suggesting that the ultimate consequence of this patriarchal structure is the exploitation of women within the movement, leaving many to realize their lack of genuine inclusion.
Read the original article here
MAGA women are not suddenly realizing their movement is sexist; the idea that they are is a convenient narrative that ignores the reality of deeply entrenched beliefs and willful ignorance. The notion of a widespread awakening within the MAGA ranks is a false hope, a comforting illusion for those who wish for a simpler explanation for the political landscape.
The claim that these women are only now seeing the sexism inherent in the movement is simply not credible. The overt sexism expressed by prominent figures within the movement has been consistently visible for years, readily available for anyone willing to see it. To suggest otherwise is to underestimate the power of confirmation bias and the strength of partisan loyalty.
Furthermore, suggesting a mass disillusionment overlooks the very nature of the MAGA movement. The core tenets often involve a hierarchical social order, reinforcing traditional gender roles where women are expected to be subservient or to occupy specific roles. This isn’t a recent discovery; it’s been a foundational element from the outset.
The idea that these women only now experience cognitive dissonance is a vast simplification. Any discomfort they may feel is likely fleeting and easily overridden by other, more deeply held beliefs, particularly unwavering loyalty to the movement’s leaders and its core principles. This is not about newfound awareness, but about a temporary and likely superficial unease.
The notion of a “regretful Trump voter” is a persistent yet often inaccurate narrative. While individual shifts in allegiance may occur, the idea of a massive, movement-wide reckoning with sexism is unlikely. The persistent support for the movement despite its clear flaws suggests a deeper commitment to its broader ideology, outweighing any concerns about sexism.
The suggestion that these women are only now experiencing the negative consequences of their political choices ignores the long-standing pattern of behavior within the movement. The idea that they are “finally having consequences” such as social exclusion is a misleading simplification of the complex dynamics at play. Their actions and associations have consequences, but these consequences are not a new revelation.
The recurring theme of “leopards eating faces” highlights the ironic situation where individuals supporting harmful policies or leaders experience the negative consequences of their choices. However, the assumption that this will cause widespread reevaluation within the MAGA movement is questionable. The tendency to blame others and to engage in deflection rather than self-reflection is a characteristic of the movement’s overall rhetoric.
The suggestion that these women are experiencing “extreme cognitive dissonance” and quickly suppressing it ignores the strength of their existing beliefs and the mechanisms they use to rationalize their continued support. Their continued support often involves blaming external forces, dismissing dissenting opinions, and reinforcing their belief in a perceived persecution.
The argument that the MAGA movement’s sexism is only now being realized is fundamentally flawed. The evidence of sexism was always there, readily apparent to those willing to see it. The belief that this realization is happening now simply neglects the ingrained biases, ideological commitments, and the power of partisan loyalty. The idea of a mass awakening within the MAGA ranks is a hopeful narrative, but it remains just that – a hopeful and probably unrealistic narrative.