By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Donald Trump has asserted he will “protect” women, but a majority of women appear unimpressed. The latest ABC News/Ipsos national poll shows the Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris enjoys a 14% lead among women over Trump, rising to 23% among women with a college degree and 34% among women under 40. The Brookings Institution suggests this owes to anger among women about the 2022 Dobbs decision. The same poll showed a 10-point swing to Harris among voters over 65 compared to 2020, some suggesting this is due to the “revenge of Boomer feminists”. Early voting tallies show women accounting for 55% of all ballots cast in battleground states such as Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Read the original article here
“It’s so disastrous,” these MAGA men lament, their voices tense with anxiety, fearing that their wives might be slipping away from the fold—secretly voting for Kamala Harris. It’s almost laughable to witness this discontent masquerading as righteous indignation. The very idea that voting can become a source of existential dread for them feels like a sketch from a farcical show, yet here we are, facing the reality where their control over women’s autonomy is slipping through their fingers.
Family dynamics have shifted, and it seems that MAGA men can’t handle the truth—women are reclaiming their voices and their rights. For too long, their rhetoric has sought to dictate everything from what women should wear to how they should vote. I can’t help but chuckle at the irony that a simple message urging women to vote for whomever they choose sends them into a tailspin. It exposes a deep-seated insecurity, a profound discomfort with the very idea that women might chart their own paths, away from their husbands’ strictures.
The horror echoed in the words of commenters claiming this phenomenon signifies “the downfall of the American family” is a testament to how fragile their sense of authority truly is. The reality is that the relationship between partner and partner—which should embody trust and respect—is instead being clouded by a misguided projection of power and control. Calls for women to “get back in the kitchen” while they pour a beer are not just sexist jokes; they reflect a mindset that simply cannot accept equality or independence for women. How painfully insecure must a man feel to view his wife’s political autonomy as a threat?
MAGA men are resorting to threats woven through rhetoric. Their fear of women voting for Harris isn’t exactly the embodiment of safeguarding homes and hearths; rather, it highlights a desperation rooted in a bruised ego. When one-commenter raises concerns about the potential for violence against women who oppose their husbands’ political views, it isn’t just idle chatter. It fuels a terrifying implication—the thought that some men might turn their frustration into physical dominance over their partners.
The world has shifted under their feet, and women are no longer satisfied with accepting societal roles dictated by men in power. When I hear how shocked they are by the notion of women secretly voting for their own beliefs, I can’t help but think it highlights glaring insecurities. Women aren’t merely vessels for their men’s ideologies; they are individuals with their own beliefs, hopes, and motivations, which can clash with the narrow view of MAGA men. It makes me wonder how many hidden ballots have stirred the ire of those who insist on dictating ballots from behind closed doors.
Charlie Kirk’s disgust is almost amusing, forwarded not by the ethos of marital unity but by a perception of betrayal. To equate a wife voting for a candidate he opposes with infidelity speaks volumes of how he views consent and partnership. The absurdity doesn’t end there; the hypocrisy shines through as his circle regularly backs a leader with a history of personal betrayals that should debase the very concept of trust. The vitriol spills beyond politics; it mirrors an unwillingness to confront what true partnership means—sharing autonomy rather than subservience.
Each time I see their panic, their desperate attempts to protect a crumbling status quo, I feel an immense satisfaction in knowing that women won’t stand down. They won’t cower in fear of accusations or threats simply to appease a cadre of overly sensitive men. Instead, they are voting to protect their bodily autonomy and defend against the erosion of their rights in a society they deserve to shape.
This isn’t merely about one election or one candidate. It’s a movement away from the oppressive demands of archaic expectations that have long dictated behavior both at home and in larger civil constructs. The turn to the polls speaks loudly to the truth—women make their voices heard, regardless of toxic opinions attempting to drown them out. The fear that encapsulates MAGA men is, in fact, the fear of losing their grip, an anxious realization that their century-old tactics of control are no longer working.
The call to action here is across not just households but neighborhoods and cities. Empowered women are finally shedding ingrained notions of political silence and embracing the right to choose, vote, and fiercely protect their rights. Seeing men cling to the notion that a woman’s choice in the booth spells doom makes me question their understanding of marriage or partnership itself. It is this pervasive male discomfort—stemming not only from losing power but also from a refusal to recognize women as equals—that leads us all into deeper discussions about equality and democracy.
So let them fret and flounder. As I engage with people around me, I remind them that true partnerships thrive on understanding and respect, not possessive control. Watching the fabric of outdated norms unravel might just be what this country needs: an awakening to the realization that women can choose, vote, and lead, no longer shackled by the archaic confines of what some men wish for them to be. That’s empowerment, and it’s here to stay.