By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Vice President Kamala Harris is polling significantly higher than Donald Trump among women, according to an ABC News/Ipsos national poll. Harris has a 14% lead over Trump overall with women, which increases to 23% for women with a college degree and 34% for women under the age of 40. The Brookings Institution credits Harris’ popularity with older voters to the 2022 Dobbs Supreme Court decision, which restricted abortion rights. Prominent pro-Trump figures have voiced concern over these poll numbers, especially as early voting data indicates a majority of female voters. In Pennsylvania, for example, 56% of mail-in ballots have come from women so far.
Read the original article here
It’s truly astounding to witness the current state of affairs in our country where MAGA men are in a tizzy over the thought of their wives possibly voting for Kamala Harris. The sheer horror they display at the idea that women might possess agency in their own voting choices seems to point to a deep-rooted insecurity, one that reveals much about their understanding of masculinity and relationships. The fundamental belief that a spouse’s vote should align with their own indicates a terrifying desire for control, rather than a mutual respect for partnership.
The notion that women secretly voting for Harris is akin to an affair is almost laughable. In reality, it’s a reflection of how threatened these men feel by women exercising their right to vote independently. The backlash against women making their choices known — or not making them known to their husbands — disrupts this outdated narrative of male authority. The fear of losing power over their domestic sphere is palpable in their outrage. Imagine being so consumed by your need for control that your partner’s political choices send you spiraling into calls of familial doom.
The comments about the “downfall of the American family” serve only to underline a worldview that sees women not as equals but as subjects who should yield to their husbands’ preferences. This kind of toxic masculinity encapsulates a misunderstanding of what it means to be a partner. A real relationship thrives on trust and respect, not dictation and suppression. If a woman feels that she can’t share her voting choice with her husband, it does not reflect on her loyalty or love; rather, it reveals the oppressive nature of the environment he has created.
Listening to the likes of Charlie Kirk lamenting the situation is a window into a worldview riddled with misogyny and denial. The claim that women should only be loyal voters — an extension of a controlling, paternalistic mindset — is utterly repugnant. The very idea that men should determine their partners’ political leanings is not just an affront to women’s rights; it’s indicative of a broader resistance to equality that these men fear will unravel their flimsy constructs of power. The cringe-worthy attempts to vilify the concept of women voting according to their conscience only highlight their desperation and insecurity.
The very fabric of what they term the “American family” does not need to unravel; it’s already been frayed by their own delusions. The reality is, for too long, women have been sidelined in these discussions. The rise in women voting for Kamala isn’t just some statistical anomaly; it’s a clarion call for recognition of their autonomy. When these men react with such horror, it shows an unwillingness to confront a changing societal landscape where women are asserting their rights and expectations.
The assertion from Jesse Watters equating secret voting with infidelity is emblematic of a crumbling patriarchal structure, one that for so long dictated how women should behave. When that structure is threatened, the reaction is often furious and violent. The idea that a woman’s choice could spark accusations of disloyalty only exposes how fragile these men’s identities truly are. It feels like a dark commentary on relationships in America when spousal approval becomes the metric by which love is measured.
It’s easy to mock the absurdity of their panic as a bunch of insecure “emasculated cucks,” but beneath the humor lies a grim reality. These men are not just throwing temper tantrums; they’re laying bare a violent potential that lurks within the kind of hyper-masculine culture they promote. The rhetoric surrounding women’s voting is a stark reminder that we’re in dangerous territory where control over women’s choices can lead to more severe consequences, including domestic violence. It’s gut-wrenching to think how many women may feel threatened or even unsafe in their own homes because of this atrociously misguided sense of ownership over one another.
There’s an ironic truth hiding in all this chaos. As Republican support for Harris grows, it signals a shifting paradigm where women are no longer willfully silenced. The shockwaves of this reckoning will reverberate. The reality is that many of these MAGA men are out of touch not only with their wives but with a country that is moving forward, demanding equality and space for diverse voices. If there was ever a wake-up call for them, this is it. Women are stepping into their agency, and that frightens them to their core. The choice to vote freely is not merely an act of defiance; it’s a declaration of independence.
In a world where women vote for whom they choose, claiming that freedom is not a threat to family but a chance for authentic partnerships built on respect. The more we push against the ordaining powers that seek to control how we express ourselves — especially in political contexts — the more we dismantle the archaic structures that bind us. So to those MAGA men clutching their pearls in horror, I say it’s time to reassess what family truly means. Let your wives be themselves, learn to respect their autonomy, and perhaps you might discover a stronger bond through openness and shared values, rather than hollow demands for loyalty aligned with your fragile ideals.