By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Japan’s 2024 English proficiency ranking plummeted to a record low of 92nd out of 116 countries, marking a continued decline since 2011. This drop, based on EF Education First’s index using data from 2.1 million test-takers, reveals stagnant English skills among Japanese youth compared to global growth. The Netherlands led the rankings, highlighting a significant gap between Japan and other high-performing nations, particularly in Europe. The representative suggested that Japan’s relative decline may stem from a failure to keep pace with global improvements rather than an absolute decrease in proficiency.
Read the original article here
Japan’s recent ranking of 92nd in English proficiency, the lowest ever recorded, is a significant development sparking much discussion. The reasons behind this low ranking are multifaceted and complex, extending beyond simply a lack of effort from students.
A key contributing factor appears to be the Japanese education system’s heavy focus on university entrance exams. Universities prioritize English reading skills for research purposes, neglecting the practical aspects of speaking and writing. This creates a skewed learning environment where fluency is sacrificed for academic achievement on standardized tests.
The quality of English teachers in Japan also comes under scrutiny. Many believe there’s room for significant improvement in the training and skills of educators. This insufficient instruction can compound the problems stemming from an exam-focused curriculum, leaving students inadequately prepared for real-world English usage.
Early childhood exposure to English seems crucial. The limited exposure to English outside the formal education system is a significant hurdle. Parents who actively encourage their children to consume English-language media—like cartoons and shows—in preschool witness far better comprehension skills. This emphasizes the importance of immersion and informal learning in language acquisition.
Even students who take supplemental English courses often lack the crucial home-based exposure that reinforces classroom learning. Those who do make a point of watching English-language media at home demonstrate a markedly faster advancement and a more intuitive grasp of the language.
Further complicating matters is the disconnect between reading and pronunciation. Many students who achieve a good reading level still struggle with pronunciation due to the lack of listening practice. Consequently, students often resort to applying Japanese pronunciation rules to English words, hindering accurate speech.
The EF English Proficiency Index, which generated the ranking, has faced some criticism. Questions have been raised about the test’s validity as a comprehensive measure of English ability, with concerns that it might not accurately reflect real-world proficiency. The lack of inclusion of the United States in the study also raises questions about the index’s scope and reliability.
Underlying these issues is a lack of inherent motivation among students. In Japan, unlike some other countries, English isn’t necessarily vital for securing employment or enjoying everyday activities. This difference in context means that the necessity to learn English isn’t as deeply ingrained in Japanese society compared to societies where it is required for economic opportunity or social engagement. This isn’t to say that there isn’t any motivation; simply that the motivation to learn is less pervasive.
The age demographic also plays a role. Younger generations, particularly those aged 18 to 25, face intense academic pressure, leaving little time for language learning. Older generations, who often use English more frequently in their workplaces, tend to perform better. This suggests that practical usage significantly improves language proficiency. The disparity highlights a need for a more balanced educational approach that integrates practical application alongside theoretical study.
The Japanese work culture, characterized by long hours and intense commitment, further hinders adult English learning. Balancing professional life with personal enrichment and language acquisition becomes difficult, leaving individuals with limited time and energy for studying.
While some argue that Japan’s low ranking is not truly representative of the ground reality—particularly in urban centers where English signage is prevalent and some level of English is spoken in many service industries— the EF index ranking still underscores a need for a holistic review of the educational system and an examination of the role English plays in Japanese society. This includes revisiting pedagogical approaches, emphasizing practical communication skills, and exploring ways to foster motivation and engagement in English learning from a young age. Simply put, while English might not be necessary for everyday life in Japan, its global importance should not be overlooked. The need for improved proficiency is important, both for Japan’s economic and cultural engagement with the global community.