Japanese Politician Sparks Outrage with Uterus Removal Proposal to Boost Birth Rate

Naoki Hyakuta, leader of the Conservative Party of Japan, sparked outrage with his radical proposals to address the country’s declining birth rate. During a podcast, he suggested policies including banning women over 18 from attending college, prohibiting marriage for women over 25, and even removing the uteruses of women over 30. While Hyakuta claims these were purely hypothetical, his co-host and senior party member Kaori Arimoto found the uterus removal suggestion too extreme, even hypothetically. After facing significant backlash, Hyakuta issued a public apology but defended himself, accusing media of taking his comments out of context. This is not the first time Hyakuta has been criticized for divisive statements, previously denying the Nanjing Massacre and opposing the LGBT Understanding Promotion Act.

Read the original article here

A Japanese politician has recently sparked outrage with a controversial proposal that has left many scratching their heads. In an attempt to address the country’s declining birth rate, Naoki Hyakuta, leader of the Conservative Party of Japan, suggested a series of radical measures, including the removal of uteruses from women over 30.

This idea, presented during a YouTube podcast, was met with immediate backlash, with many questioning the politician’s understanding of basic biology and human rights. The suggestion, while labeled as hypothetical, highlighted a worrying trend of conservative politicians proposing extreme solutions to complex social problems, often targeting women’s bodies and autonomy.

The politician’s rationale seems to stem from the belief that women are a key factor in the declining birth rate. He assumes that by limiting women’s opportunities and imposing restrictions on their reproductive rights, they will be pressured into having children earlier. This approach completely ignores the societal factors that contribute to the issue, such as the high cost of living, lack of affordable childcare, and gender inequality in the workplace.

Hyakuta’s proposal is not only morally reprehensible but also entirely impractical. Removing a woman’s uterus, the very organ responsible for carrying a child, would definitively prevent her from having children, directly contradicting the aim of increasing birth rates.

The backlash against Hyakuta’s comments has been swift and widespread, with people from all walks of life expressing their disgust and disbelief. Social media has been flooded with reactions, ranging from anger and frustration to humor and satire. Many have pointed out the absurdity of the idea, comparing it to a dystopian nightmare.

While Hyakuta has since apologized for his remarks, the damage has been done. His comments have exposed a deep-seated misogyny and lack of understanding of women’s rights within a section of the Japanese political landscape.

This incident serves as a stark reminder that we must be vigilant against those who seek to control women’s bodies and choices for their own political gain. Instead of resorting to such harmful and unrealistic solutions, we must focus on addressing the underlying issues that contribute to declining birth rates, such as economic hardship, societal pressures, and work-life imbalances.

Ultimately, the responsibility for addressing this complex issue lies with governments and societies as a whole. It requires a comprehensive approach that prioritizes individual rights and social well-being, not the forceful suppression of women’s autonomy and bodily integrity.