By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Iran’s government is escalating its efforts to suppress women who resist the hijab mandate by opening a “Clinic for Quitting Hijab Removal” in Tehran. This clinic, overseen by the government body responsible for enforcing strict religious standards, aims to provide “scientific and psychological treatment” to women who choose not to wear the hijab, particularly young women. This move follows the recent arrest and forced psychiatric evaluation of a student who protested the hijab requirement by stripping to her underwear. These actions are part of a wider pattern of repression against women in Iran, including increased surveillance, morality police presence, and bans on unveiled women in public spaces. This systematic oppression of women, labelled “gender apartheid” by the UN, has been widely condemned by human rights groups and Iranian mental health professionals.
Read the original article here
Iran’s recent establishment of a mental health clinic specifically designed to “treat” women who refuse to wear the hijab is a chilling reminder of the lengths to which some governments will go to enforce their ideologies. It’s an unsettling echo of historical practices where dissent was pathologized as mental illness to justify suppression and control. This isn’t about mental health; it’s a thinly veiled attempt to punish women who dare to assert their autonomy and reject societal norms. The very idea of a “treatment” for something as fundamental as personal choice is deeply disturbing. It’s a blatant attempt to re-educate and re-program women to conform to a rigid and outdated vision of femininity.
The clinic’s existence is particularly ironic considering Iran’s desire to attract tourism. It paints a picture of a society where fundamental human rights are violated in the name of religious dogma. The government’s actions are a stark reminder that the hijab is often used as a tool to control women and limit their agency. This “treatment” is not about providing support, but rather about enforcing obedience and silencing dissent.
There’s a clear pattern of equating nonconformity with mental illness. This isn’t a new phenomenon; it’s a tactic used throughout history to discredit and punish those who challenge the status quo. History is filled with examples of “diagnoses” being used to justify the subjugation of marginalized groups. The very notion of “treatment” in this context reeks of forced indoctrination and manipulation, a disturbing echo of re-education camps that have been used to break individuals and force them to conform to a specific ideology.
It’s not surprising that the international community is expressing outrage and concern. The clinic is a symbol of a larger issue, a stark reminder that women in many parts of the world continue to face oppression and discrimination based on their gender. This situation highlights the need for global solidarity and a renewed commitment to fight against all forms of gender-based violence and oppression. While the world watches in horror, it’s important to remember that the fight for women’s rights is a global one, and the struggle for equality and self-determination must continue.