By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Economists predict that two of Donald Trump’s key campaign promises—mass deportations and increased tariffs—would significantly increase food prices in the United States. Deporting undocumented immigrants, who comprise a substantial portion of the agricultural workforce, would cause labor shortages leading to higher wages and subsequently higher prices for domestically grown produce. Simultaneously, tariffs on imported food would further elevate costs for consumers, as there’s no mechanism to offset the combined impact of labor shortages and import taxes. This price increase would affect a wide range of food products, from fruits and vegetables to dairy and meat, impacting all segments of the food supply chain.
Read the original article here
Get Ready for Higher Food Prices
Higher food prices are on the horizon, and it’s a situation fueled by a complex interplay of factors, not just one single cause. Many Americans already feel the pinch of rising grocery costs, a concern that deeply impacts how they view the economy and their political choices. This anxiety over rising prices played a significant role in the recent election, with many voters seeking a candidate promising relief.
However, some proposed solutions might exacerbate the problem, not solve it. Certain policies focused on increased border control and mass deportations could significantly disrupt the agricultural workforce. The American farming industry heavily relies on undocumented workers, and their removal would lead to labor shortages. This shortage would inevitably drive up wages, and those increased labor costs would be directly passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for domestically grown produce.
The impact extends beyond domestically grown food. The United States imports a substantial portion of its food supply, including a significant amount of fresh fruit, seafood, and other staples. Proposed tariffs on imported goods, aimed at boosting domestic production, would likely increase the cost of these imported items, further impacting consumers’ grocery bills. Even a relatively modest tariff increase of 10-20 percent on imported goods could result in double-digit price increases for many popular food items, especially in the short term while domestic production attempts to increase to meet demand. The added costs would inevitably be absorbed by consumers.
This isn’t just about the direct effect of tariffs; the situation is compounded by other contributing factors. The past few years have already seen substantial increases in food prices, often described as price gouging, exceeding overall inflation rates. This trend is only expected to worsen with potential new policies. Companies, observing increased consumer spending during periods of economic stimulus, have also raised prices, not necessarily due to increased costs but simply because they could. Landlords, observing similar trends, have also implemented rent hikes. All of this contributes to the general feeling that things are simply too expensive.
There’s a widespread belief that increased immigration enforcement will magically decrease food prices, but that’s a misconception. The simple reality is that removing a significant portion of the agricultural workforce will not suddenly result in a flood of American workers filling those roles. The agricultural sector already faces a chronic labor shortage, and the assumption that readily available replacements will appear is unrealistic. This labor gap directly translates into higher costs and, subsequently, higher prices.
Even with already rising inflation, some suggest that further increases, particularly through policies like broad tariffs, are the solution to problems of inflation and supply chain issues. The belief that imposing tariffs on a large scale, causing an immediate and significant price hike on a huge portion of goods, would somehow solve inflation is not a well-founded economic prediction. The result will likely be significant economic and social disruption, and more pressure on consumers.
Furthermore, there’s a concerning lack of understanding surrounding the complexities of policy and its long-term consequences. Voters often react to immediate circumstances and may not fully grasp the cascading effects of policy choices. In this case, the focus on punishing a particular administration might inadvertently lead to more harmful consequences in the long run. The assumption that a change in administration will magically reverse price increases without addressing the underlying causes is naive.
The overall picture paints a stark reality: higher food prices are almost inevitable given the confluence of these factors. We’re looking at a situation where multiple independent actions could each trigger price hikes, and together, the consequences could be disastrous. Stockpiling non-perishable foods is a reasonable precautionary measure for some, given the potential for substantial and sustained price increases and even potential shortages. The future holds significant economic uncertainty, and individuals should prepare for a period of potentially challenging financial realities. The belief that prices will magically return to pre-COVID levels is unfounded. This situation demands careful consideration, planning, and a realistic appraisal of the challenges ahead.